1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf02990665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop cover and crop phenological information from red and infrared spectral responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As scale of aerial photography was 1:30,000 or larger, individual fields, crop plants and crop row structure were detectable and inventory involved fieldwise visual delineation. The major crops mapped included (i) wheat in Patiala district of Punjab (Dhanju and Shankarnarayana, 1978) and Mehsana district of Gujarat, (ii) groundnut in Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh (Sahai et al, 1977), (iii) rice and sugarcane in Mandya district (Karnataka) where 11-channel multispectral scanner was flown and subjected to digital interpretation (Ayyangar et al, 1980) and (iv) agricultural land use of both field and plantation crops (paddy, sugarcane, rubber, coconut, tea, tapioca and others in Idukki district of Kerala) (Sahai et al, 1985), to name a few. Visual interpretation of data of Landsat-1 was feasible at 1:1 million to 1:250,000 scale, and thus, digital crop inventory was not conducted.…”
Section: Eo Data For Agricultural Crops In India-evolution Over Five ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As scale of aerial photography was 1:30,000 or larger, individual fields, crop plants and crop row structure were detectable and inventory involved fieldwise visual delineation. The major crops mapped included (i) wheat in Patiala district of Punjab (Dhanju and Shankarnarayana, 1978) and Mehsana district of Gujarat, (ii) groundnut in Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh (Sahai et al, 1977), (iii) rice and sugarcane in Mandya district (Karnataka) where 11-channel multispectral scanner was flown and subjected to digital interpretation (Ayyangar et al, 1980) and (iv) agricultural land use of both field and plantation crops (paddy, sugarcane, rubber, coconut, tea, tapioca and others in Idukki district of Kerala) (Sahai et al, 1985), to name a few. Visual interpretation of data of Landsat-1 was feasible at 1:1 million to 1:250,000 scale, and thus, digital crop inventory was not conducted.…”
Section: Eo Data For Agricultural Crops In India-evolution Over Five ...mentioning
confidence: 99%