2017
DOI: 10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00025.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop geometry and weed management effect on weed dynamics in soybean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The per cent reduction in dry matter of total weeds due to propaquizafop + imazethapyr and imazethapyr + quizalofop-ethyl was 92.32 and 90.51, respectively compared to weedy check (1126.79 g m -2 ). Results corroborate with the findings of Renjith and Sharma et al (2014), Ramprakash et al (2016), Parmar et al (2016) and Nagre et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The per cent reduction in dry matter of total weeds due to propaquizafop + imazethapyr and imazethapyr + quizalofop-ethyl was 92.32 and 90.51, respectively compared to weedy check (1126.79 g m -2 ). Results corroborate with the findings of Renjith and Sharma et al (2014), Ramprakash et al (2016), Parmar et al (2016) and Nagre et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Depending on the related weed species, their density, the length of crop weed competition, etc., and their cumulative effect of decreased crop production, weeds caused significant damage to the crop. These findings are consistent with the findings of Kamble et al 2017 [2] and Khedkar et al 2009 [3] .…”
Section: Effect Of Herbicide On Crop Productivitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…With respect to weed management practices, preemergence herbicide pendimethalin at 1.0 kg/ha followed by hand weeding at 30 DAS ( 28260 and -17 and 2017-18, respectively) This might be due to reduction in the cost of cultivation by use of power weeder for weeding instead of manual labour as well as optimum spacing for movement of power weeder without plant damage which might have increased the yield and increased the net returns and B: C ratio. These results were in confirmatory with the finding of Baskaran and Kavimani (2014) and Nagre et al (2017).…”
Section: Effect On Economicssupporting
confidence: 92%