2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05657-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop Growth Simulation Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these methods perform better since various types of inputs are fused, the acquisition of the required data is feasible at smaller scales such as farmlevel. Acquisition of data poses an essential limitation when larger scale areas are considered because of the cost of producing such high-resolution and accurate data at that scale [1,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these methods perform better since various types of inputs are fused, the acquisition of the required data is feasible at smaller scales such as farmlevel. Acquisition of data poses an essential limitation when larger scale areas are considered because of the cost of producing such high-resolution and accurate data at that scale [1,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review study of agricultural practices in [4], the authors describe that a "major limitation of crop growth models is the lack of spatial information on the actual conditions of each field or region". A more extensive list of shortcomings is provided in [5], where the authors state that "the main limitations of crop growth models are the cost of obtaining the necessary input data to run the model, the lack of spatial information", and "the input data quality".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approaches to estimating crop phenology have been through ground observations and the use of crop models (e.g., Simple and Universal CROp growth Simulator (SUCROS) [12], Hybrid-Corn [14], WOrld FOod STudies (WOFOST) [13][14][15]). The crop models can estimate crop growth dates with a high level of accuracy [root mean square error (RMSE): 0-4 days], but they require a number of detailed information inputs such as crop (e.g., cultivar used and plant population), weather (e.g., temperature, rainfall, solar radiation and wind speed) conditions [14,16] and soil (e.g., initial soil moisture). On the one hand, the use of these crop models is usually limited by the availability of the required data inputs; on the other hand, the models need to be calibrated for particular species and site-specific conditions based on ground data [11,16], and the ground observations collected by observers are not cost-efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crop models can estimate crop growth dates with a high level of accuracy [root mean square error (RMSE): 0-4 days], but they require a number of detailed information inputs such as crop (e.g., cultivar used and plant population), weather (e.g., temperature, rainfall, solar radiation and wind speed) conditions [14,16] and soil (e.g., initial soil moisture). On the one hand, the use of these crop models is usually limited by the availability of the required data inputs; on the other hand, the models need to be calibrated for particular species and site-specific conditions based on ground data [11,16], and the ground observations collected by observers are not cost-efficient. Accordingly, the traditional methods are sitespecific and typically cannot monitor crop phenology beyond the field scale over larger areas [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%