2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3496-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop mixtures: does niche complementarity hold for belowground resources? An experimental test using rice genotypic pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, complementary nitrogen acquisition strategies between cereals and legumes, that is, soil nitrogen acquisition for cereals versus atmospheric nitrogen fixation for legumes, contribute to yield gains in cereal–legume intercrops (Bedoussac et al., 2015). While the theoretical and applied knowledge on the potential benefits of multi‐species intercropping are well developed, our understanding of how niche complementarity owing to within‐species or within‐genotype variability remains less well explored (but see Montazeaud et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, complementary nitrogen acquisition strategies between cereals and legumes, that is, soil nitrogen acquisition for cereals versus atmospheric nitrogen fixation for legumes, contribute to yield gains in cereal–legume intercrops (Bedoussac et al., 2015). While the theoretical and applied knowledge on the potential benefits of multi‐species intercropping are well developed, our understanding of how niche complementarity owing to within‐species or within‐genotype variability remains less well explored (but see Montazeaud et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chickpea may have facilitated P uptake by millet, a strong competitor with a well-developed root system and a high degree of plasticity (Rostamza et al 2013). Our results are similar to those of Montazeaud et al (2018), who reported that trait dissimilarity led to the dominant genotypes gaining more in the mixture than the subdominant genotypes lost,…”
Section: 3asupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results and others 39 suggest that breeding for uniformity within a crop may miss yield advances that might be obtained by breeding for greater genetic variation, or by planting genotypic mixtures of the same crop species; two strategies that exploit trait variability to minimize disease incidence and intraspecific competition, or that select for differences in competitive abilities.…”
Section: Breeding For Biodiversity-based Agricultural Practicesmentioning
confidence: 78%