Crop rotations and crop residues are relevant parameters for agricultural carbon footprints

Abstract

Agriculture is the key for achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals: food security and climate action. To achieve these targets "climate-smart" agricultural practices need to be developed. Life cycle assessment and product carbon footprints are well established and internationally recognized tools to assist the process of improving environmental performance. However, there is room for methodological improvement of agricultural life cycle assessments and product carbon footprints. For agronomists, it is widely known that crop rotations and crop residues do fulfill important agronomic functions, but they are not adequately represented in current life cycle assessment and product carbon footprint modeling practice. New methods tested in this study allow the inclusion of crop rotation effects and crop residues as co-products, whilst keeping at the same time the product focus. Product carbon footprints are calculated with and without consideration of these effects; results are compared. If crop rotations are considered, wheat bread, cow milk, and rapeseed biodiesel have lower product carbon footprints (− 11, − 22, and − 16%, respectively). The product carbon footprint of straw bioethanol significantly increases (+ 80%) when considering straw as an agricultural co-product instead of as waste. Ignoring crop rotation effects underestimates the annual greenhouse gas savings of EU-28 rapeseed biodiesel by 1.67 million t CO 2 e and 20%, respectively. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that crop rotations and straw harvest should be considered for the product carbon footprints of bread, milk, and first-and second-generation biofuels. Since crop rotations and straw harvest are performed worldwide, the findings are relevant to all regions in the world. Comparing crop rotations and identifying climate-smart agricultural practices without losing the production orientation are key challenges for environmental assessments of agriculture in order to achieve the challenging combination of the food security and climate action sustainable development goals.

Link Between Sustainability and Industry 4.0: Trends, Challenges and New Perspectives

“…The cluster LCA is related to subthemes 'GREENHOUSE-GASES' and 'EDUCATION'. The LCA analysis has been applied in different scenarios such as healthcare [114], energy [115], agriculture [116] and manufacturing processes [117], and skills training of undergraduates about the understanding of LCA to promote SM [118].…”

Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy

“…Herewith, especially soil quality [276] and the impact of different agricultural systems on the biodiversity [277] are crucial aspects that are not fully included in the current methodologies. In addition, it is crucial to assess whole crop rotations, however, currently, often only the environmental performance of individual crops is analyzed [278]. This is especially true for the BCS which include intercropping and the use of legumes.…”

A perspective on the potential of using marine organic fertilizers for the sustainable management of coastal ecosystem services

“…The use of green manures, whereby green standing biomass is incorporated into the soil, is a technique that has potential for improvement of fertility especially of soils that have low organic matter. Forage legumes, such as white clover and red clover (Trifolium repens L.; Trifolium pratense L.) are often used for this purpose because of their high productivity, associated with N-fixation, and high efficiency of nutrient cycling (Schmeer et al 2014) within a crop rotation (Loges et al 2018;Brankatschk and Finkbeiner 2017). In ruminant livestock farming systems, forage legumes are widely used to provide both grazed and conserved feed of Fig.…”