2016
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201500520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop yield and SOC responses to biochar application were dependent on soil texture and crop type in southern Quebec, Canada

Abstract: Changes to soil nutrient availability and increases for crop yield and soil organic C (SOC) concentration on biochar‐amended soil under temperate climate conditions have only been reported in a few publications. The objective of this work was to determine if biochar application rates up to 20 Mg ha−1 affect nutrient availability in soil, SOC stocks and yield of corn (Zea mays L.), soybean (Glycine max L.), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) on two coarse‐textured soils (loamy sand, sandy clay loam) in S Que… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive increase in SOC and macronutrients upon soil amendment with digestate-enriched biochar materials indicates that coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis could be an important step in improving and maintaining long term fertility [59]. Moreover, in the present study the increase in SOC also resulted in synergistic benefits such as reduced bulk density and increased plant-availability of Ca, K, P, and Na (see Supplementary Table S2).…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbonsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The positive increase in SOC and macronutrients upon soil amendment with digestate-enriched biochar materials indicates that coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis could be an important step in improving and maintaining long term fertility [59]. Moreover, in the present study the increase in SOC also resulted in synergistic benefits such as reduced bulk density and increased plant-availability of Ca, K, P, and Na (see Supplementary Table S2).…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbonsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…High rates of corn residue removal can increase the risks of soil erosion and reduce soil C storage (Acharya & Blanco‐Canqui, ; Blanco‐Canqui, Stalker, et al, ; Blanco‐Canqui, Tatarko, Stalker, Shaver, & Van Donk, ; Laird & Chang, ; Ruis et al, ). Adding biochar to corn fields is a potential strategy to mitigate the negative effects of residue harvesting on soil quality and C stocks (Backer, Schwinghamer, Whalen, Seguin, & Smith, ; Laird & Chang, ; Ventura et al, ). Biochar application can rapidly increase soil C levels relative to other practices such as cover crops and diversified crop rotations, which commonly take extended periods of time to significantly change soil C stocks (Poeplau & Don, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is equivalent to an application rate of 26 Mg ha -1 which is commonly used in the literature as a field application rate of biochar literature as a field application rate in temperate soils [ 7 , 23 ]. In our previous field and greenhouse experiments, this application rate of SC500 increased maize yield and N uptake under field conditions and altered root morphology under greenhouse conditions [ 3 , 8 ]. For DC the treatment was applied to the same compartment as the seeds; for VOC the treatment was applied to the compartment opposite the seeds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each seedling was harvested at the V3 growth stage, approximately 28 days after sowing. This stage was chosen since our previous publication showed that increased root length at the V3 growth stage in soil amended with SC500 was associated with improved N uptake and root biomass production at the reproductive growth stage under greenhouse conditions and increased yield and N uptake under field conditions on loamy sand soil [ 3 , 8 ]. Therefore, we considered it an appropriate growth for sampling since the biochar produced measurable effects at this stage, that were translated into yield differences at harvest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation