Cropping practices manipulate abundance patterns of root and soil microbiome members paving the way to smart farming

Abstract

BackgroundHarnessing beneficial microbes presents a promising strategy to optimize plant growth and agricultural sustainability. Little is known to which extent and how specifically soil and plant microbiomes can be manipulated through different cropping practices. Here, we investigated soil and wheat root microbial communities in a cropping system experiment consisting of conventional and organic managements, both with different tillage intensities.ResultsWhile microbial richness was marginally affected, we found pronounced cropping effects on community composition, which were specific for the respective microbiomes. Soil bacterial communities were primarily structured by tillage, whereas soil fungal communities responded mainly to management type with additional effects by tillage. In roots, management type was also the driving factor for bacteria but not for fungi, which were generally determined by changes in tillage intensity. To quantify an “effect size” for microbiota manipulation, we found that about 10% of variation in microbial communities was explained by the tested cropping practices. Cropping sensitive microbes were taxonomically diverse, and they responded in guilds of taxa to the specific practices. These microbes also included frequent community members or members co-occurring with many other microbes in the community, suggesting that cropping practices may allow manipulation of influential community members.ConclusionsUnderstanding the abundance patterns of cropping sensitive microbes presents the basis towards developing microbiota management strategies for smart farming. For future targeted microbiota management—e.g., to foster certain microbes with specific agricultural practices—a next step will be to identify the functional traits of the cropping sensitive microbes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-017-0389-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Lime and ammonium carbonate fumigation coupled with bio‐organic fertilizer application steered banana rhizosphere to assemble a unique microbiome against Panama disease

“…A majority of OTUs in the meta‐modules were not shared between LAB and CKB networks, indicating basal shifts in network architecture after soil microbiome manipulation. Moreover, Firmicutes and Gemmatimonadetes dominated meta‐modules were found in the LAB network, whereas Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes dominated meta‐modules were observed in the CKB network, illustrating a core bacterial community quasi‐functional shift (Hartman et al ., ). Furthermore, more module hubs were present in disease‐suppressive network as revealed by the Zi‐Pi relationship of each individual OTU, which means that the community works more efficiently and the social goal is more likely to be achieved with more cooperation (Lu et al ., ).…”

High nitrogen rates do not increase canola yield and may affect soil bacterial functioning

“…The relationship between soil microbial diversity, ecosystem functioning, associated services, and management practices (e.g., N fertilization) is under increasing scrutiny to elucidate the complexities that underpin the productivity of agroecosystems (Brussaard, de Ruiter, & Brown, ; Hartmann, Frey, Mayer, Mäder, & Widmer, , ). Increased biodiversity in the microbial community may enhance the functional capacity of the soil ecosystem (Bender, Wagg, & van der Heijden, ).…”

The Impact of Genetic Changes during Crop Domestication

“…Furthermore, we know very little about how domestication impacted microbial communities (but see [135][136][137]). Early agriculture must have caused significant impacts on soil microbial communities, from clearing land and altering plant communities, to tilling and disturbing soil, to changing soil fertility [138]. We suspect that changes in microbiomes during domestication may have had enormous impacts on symbiotic relationships as well as crop relations with pathogens, although evidence for this is quite limited to date.…”