2006
DOI: 10.1080/00167223.2006.10649561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crops, trees, and birds: Biodiversity change under agricultural intensification in Uganda's farmed landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 26 sites were selected to represent a range of vegetation and habitat types of varying degrees of anthropogenic disturbance and management intensities. Selected study sites were grouped using human population density as a surrogate measure of agricultural intensity (Bolwig et al 2006). Detailed vegetation, environmental and landscape characteristics of the 26 sites are presented in Munyuli (2011a).…”
Section: Study Area and Selection Of Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 26 sites were selected to represent a range of vegetation and habitat types of varying degrees of anthropogenic disturbance and management intensities. Selected study sites were grouped using human population density as a surrogate measure of agricultural intensity (Bolwig et al 2006). Detailed vegetation, environmental and landscape characteristics of the 26 sites are presented in Munyuli (2011a).…”
Section: Study Area and Selection Of Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inputs of nutrient subsidies through fertiliser drift and down-slope leaching (Duncan et al, 2008), livestock access (Didham et al, 2009) and the spillover of predator or consumer organisms (Blitzer et al, 2012)) could likely compromise the effectiveness of land sparing strategies. Proponents of land sharing advocate the creation of multi-functional agricultural landscapes that generate and utilise natural ecological processes within a social and cultural context (Bolwig et al, 2006;Perfecto and Vandermeer, 2008;Knoke et al, 2009;Barthel et al, 2013). In turn, this approach has been criticised for promoting lower yields and therefore leading to further forest clearance for agriculture.…”
Section: Novel Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La siembra de palma de aceite a escala industrial, ha generado impactos negativos en diversos componentes de la biodiversidad (Aratrakorn, Thunhikorn & Donald, 2006;Fitzherbert et al, 2008;Edwards et. al., 2010;García-Ulloa, Sloan, Pacheco, Ghazoul & Pin Koh, 2012), a través de la degradación de hábitat, destrucción y reemplazamiento de la vegetación nativa, que en el caso de la Orinoquía afecta a bosques húmedos, bosques secos, bosques de galería, pastizales y humedales (Blydenstein, 1967;Bolwing, Pomeroy, Tushabe & Mushabe, 2006;Pinzón, Pardi, Trejos & Midori, 2009), lo que genera cambios en la composición y estructura de la vegetación (Correa & Stevenson, 2010).…”
unclassified
“…Estos cultivos son dominados por un reducido número de aves comunes que tienen amplio rango de distribución, mientras que todas aquellas especies asociadas a bosque quedan confinadas a los relictos de vegetación nativa (Aratrakorn et al, 2006;Bolwing et al, 2006;Achondo et al, 2011). Las aves asociadas a estos monocultivos habitan diferentes espacios de la plantación y de acuerdo a la edad de la palma se han encontrado especies distintas.…”
unclassified