Cross-border mobility responses to COVID-19 in Europe: new evidence from facebook data

Abstract

Background Assessing the impact of government responses to Covid-19 is crucial to contain the pandemic and improve preparedness for future crises. We investigate here the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and infection threats on the daily evolution of cross-border movements of people during the Covid-19 pandemic. We use a unique database on Facebook users’ mobility, and rely on regression and machine learning models to identify the role of infection threats and containment policies. Permutation techniques allow us to compare the impact and predictive power of these two categories of variables. Results In contrast with studies on within-border mobility, our models point to a stronger importance of containment policies in explaining changes in cross-border traffic as compared with international travel bans and fears of being infected. The latter are proxied by the numbers of Covid-19 cases and deaths at destination. Although the ranking among coercive policies varies across modelling techniques, containment measures in the destination country (such as cancelling of events, restrictions on internal movements and public gatherings), and school closures in the origin country (influencing parental leaves) have the strongest impacts on cross-border movements. Conclusion While descriptive in nature, our findings have policy-relevant implications. Cross-border movements of people predominantly consist of labor commuting flows and business travels. These economic and essential flows are marginally influenced by the fear of infection and international travel bans. They are mostly governed by the stringency of internal containment policies and the ability to travel.

Cross-border mobility in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion: impact of COVID-19 border restrictions on everyday activities and visiting social network members

“…A substantial proportion of participants decreased their number of cross-border visits during the pandemic. Prior research in 25 country pairs using phone and Facebook similarly demonstrated a sharp decline in CBM of up to 82% compared to pre-pandemic levels ( 28 ). Compared to Belgium and German participants, Dutch participants more frequently showed an increase in both overall visits and short visits, adjusted for other characteristics.…”

Improving testing capacity for COVID-19: experiences and lessons from Senegal, Uganda, Nigeria, and the Democratic Republic of Congo

“…The groups of people at high risk for stigmatization are truck drivers, sex workers, migrants, returnees, and displaced individuals ( 25 , 26 ). Efforts to control the cross-border transmission of COVID-19 can be hampered by political and economic factors that can cause people working in the cross-border area to be unwilling to undergo testing ( 27 ). However, worldwide, the pandemic has impacted the mental health of millions of people by increasing levels of fear, stress, anxiety, and uncertainty.…”

Towards Improved XAI-Based Epidemiological Research into the Next Potential Pandemic

“…Docquier et al show how the inclusion of extra parameters (to incorporate day-specific effects-i.e., 366 day-specific time dummies) in their models deteriorates the predictive power of the ML model. The authors conclude that, given a dataset, the gains from adding information are indeed outbalanced by the costs linked to the inflated dimensionality of the AI computation problem [18]. Hinns et al study XAI generated by various predictors on a dataset and show how inconsistent model interpretations emerge among a set of random data sub-sets when using little data, and that by increasing the size of the data, interpretations of the random data subsets converge towards each other [19].…”