2009
DOI: 10.1080/02642060902749500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-buying evaluations in the retail banking industry

Abstract: Is a customer's past purchase experience of traditional banking products applicable to the continuing purchase of insurance and investment products at a bank branch? Are service attributes used with similar extensions evaluated differently from when used with dissimilar extensions? In response to these questions, this study develops and examines a framework of service attributes (e.g., locational and one-stop shopping convenience, functional and technical service quality, and firm reputation and size) having p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of the literature indicates few empirical studies investigating relationship quality in retail banking with the available work focused on satisfaction and trust dimensions. For instance, as shown in Table 1, it has been argued that relationship quality is unidimensional (e.g., Ndubisi, 2006;Ndubisi & Madu, 2009), two-dimensional (e.g., Liang & Wang, 2006;Liu & Wu, 2009;Wong, Hung, & Chow, 2007), and four dimensions (Roberts, Varki, & Brodie, 2003). In many instances, these works have modeled relationship quality as separate independent dimensions, and in some cases, having a direct effect on consumer behavior outcomes.…”
Section: Toward a Conceptualization Of Relationship Quality In Retailmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A review of the literature indicates few empirical studies investigating relationship quality in retail banking with the available work focused on satisfaction and trust dimensions. For instance, as shown in Table 1, it has been argued that relationship quality is unidimensional (e.g., Ndubisi, 2006;Ndubisi & Madu, 2009), two-dimensional (e.g., Liang & Wang, 2006;Liu & Wu, 2009;Wong, Hung, & Chow, 2007), and four dimensions (Roberts, Varki, & Brodie, 2003). In many instances, these works have modeled relationship quality as separate independent dimensions, and in some cases, having a direct effect on consumer behavior outcomes.…”
Section: Toward a Conceptualization Of Relationship Quality In Retailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, cross-buying behavior reflects the breadth of a relationship, which is common among retail banks. Prior research has shown that customers' relationship perceptions (e.g., via attributes of trust and commitment) had a positive influence on cross-buying decisions in retail settings (e.g., De Wulf et al, 2001;Hennig-Thurau et al, 2002) and financial service settings (e.g., Aurier & N'Goala, 2010;Liu & Wu, 2009). Based on these findings, we argue that favorable relationship quality perceptions (via trust, commitment, and satisfaction) by retail bank consumers enhances cross-buying behavior since a strong relationship with the customer increases the customers' likelihood to purchase additional services such as insurance, stocks and loan products in the future.…”
Section: Relationship Quality and Cross-buying Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, in a competitive environment, cross-buying is an important source of enterprise profits, and research in this area is rather minor (Liu and Wu, 2008). Moreover, in the antecedents of relationship quality, although some studies have pointed out that service quality would affect the relationship quality (Liu and Wu, 2009), whether or not the marketers have the motives of service is an important issue. Among the motives, this study chooses customer orientation as an origin to build a model to explain the process of customer orientation influencing cross-buying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent papers in the fields of banking and management that have inspired and motivated our research are grouped in accordance with their focus: efficiency and productivity (Chen, 2009;Figueira and Nellis, 2009;and Sufian, 2009); client satisfaction and service quality, customer equity and brand equity (Liu and Wu, 2009;Nadiri et al, 2009;Proença and de Castro, 2007;Roofthooft, 2010;Wang et al, 2009); small business banking (Locke and Boulanaour, 2009); economies of scale and internal firm organization (Peris-Ortiz and RuedaArmengot, 2010); and perceived risk and trust for Internet banking (Yousafzai et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%