1996
DOI: 10.1021/ma960166d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Chain Transfer Rate Constants of Styrene-Terminated Radicals to Methyl Acrylate and Methyl Methacrylate

Abstract: The chain transfer-to-monomer dominated regime of the molar mass distribution of lowconversion emulsion copolymers of styrene and methyl acrylate and of styrene and methyl methacrylate of various compositions, prepared with varying initiator concentrations, was analyzed with size exclusion chromatography. By extrapolation of the values of the slope of the natural logarithm of the number molar mass distribution to zero initiator concentration, it was possible to determine the average chaintransfer coefficient a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
27
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of a copolymerization, the kinetic parameters and concentrations should be based on overall radical and monomer concentrations. [6][7][8] Conventional chain transfer agents, such as thiols, have chain transfer constants in the range 10 -2 -10; consequently high concentrations are required to significantly reduce the molecular weight of the polymer. [9] Since thiols are odorous and toxic, any residuals require removal from the polymer product.…”
Section: Chain Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a copolymerization, the kinetic parameters and concentrations should be based on overall radical and monomer concentrations. [6][7][8] Conventional chain transfer agents, such as thiols, have chain transfer constants in the range 10 -2 -10; consequently high concentrations are required to significantly reduce the molecular weight of the polymer. [9] Since thiols are odorous and toxic, any residuals require removal from the polymer product.…”
Section: Chain Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8] An alternative formulation, [9] which has been shown to be of equivalent reliability by Heuts and Davis, [10] makes use of the information provided by the complete molecular weight distribution (MWD) (P(M)) to obtain consistent values for chain transfer coefficients. [7,8,[11][12][13][14][15][16] In the portion of this distribution where chain termination is dominated by chain transfer to monomer, the relationship ln(P(M)) / ÀC M Â M/M 0 applies, where M 0 is the molecular weight of the monomer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters shown in lines 1 to 4 (from C m to u) are used for the present model CLD function. Note that what is important is not the absolute values of k p [M] p and " t t e , but the ratio of 1/k p [M] p " t t e to C m , as shown in Equation (8). If we neglect the effect of the unknown chains, the slope of the CLD method would be g = 5.05 6 10 -5 .…”
Section: Model Cld Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the CLD follows the most probable distribution, the W (log 10 r) curve has the peak at r = P w . The peak location would be r = 2/g for the distribution function given by Equation (8). If we evaluate the slope by the tangent at this location, Equation (13) gives:…”
Section: Model Cld Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%