2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-classified multilevel models improved standard error estimates of covariates in clinical outcomes – a simulation study

Abstract: Cross-classified multilevel models improved standard error estimates of covariates in clinical outcomes -a simulation study,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine how interannual climate variation and local environmental conditions influenced reproductive phenophase abundances, we employed hierarchical cross‐classified models (HCM), a generalized linear mixed model for nested data when lower‐level units are cross‐classified by two or more higher‐level units (Doedens et al., 2022; Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). Using HLM 7 software (Scientific Software International, Inc.) and full maximum likelihood, HCM estimated the fixed effects of climate (precipitation, temperature) and environment (groundwater, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine how interannual climate variation and local environmental conditions influenced reproductive phenophase abundances, we employed hierarchical cross‐classified models (HCM), a generalized linear mixed model for nested data when lower‐level units are cross‐classified by two or more higher‐level units (Doedens et al., 2022; Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). Using HLM 7 software (Scientific Software International, Inc.) and full maximum likelihood, HCM estimated the fixed effects of climate (precipitation, temperature) and environment (groundwater, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This random effect accounts for the assumption that if one player within the contact event experiences a high HAE, then another player may also experience a high HAE. Without accounting for these interdependencies within the multilevel data structure, model estimates, standard errors, and associated CIs may all be biased, and inaccurate statistical inferences may then result [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each model, player ID was nested within match ID and included as a random effect to account for repeated measurements within players and within matches. Contact event ID (i.e., the overall event identifier for each tackler, ball carrier, and player rucking in a single incident) was also included as a random effect to account for the multiple membership and cross-classification of all player contact events nested within different players, depending on the player combination involved in the contact event [23,24]. This random effect accounts for the assumption that if one player within the contact event experiences a high HAE, then another player may also experience a high HAE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%