2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03756-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-country comparison of the efficiency of the European forest sector and second stage DEA approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the analysis of the factors of forestry ecological efficiency, EDL was a moderating important factor. However, in the study of Ester and Sebastian [52], GDP was a vital factor to the efficiency of the forest sector. The reasons for the different conclusions the 28 EU/EFTA countries taken as a subject, and GDP played an important role in international efficiency evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the analysis of the factors of forestry ecological efficiency, EDL was a moderating important factor. However, in the study of Ester and Sebastian [52], GDP was a vital factor to the efficiency of the forest sector. The reasons for the different conclusions the 28 EU/EFTA countries taken as a subject, and GDP played an important role in international efficiency evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interesting result involves the costs for services and outlines their role in efficiency. The same authors (Kovalčík, 2020) and Gutiérrez and Lozano (2020) made cross-country efficiency comparisons of forestry through the DEA. The research of Gutiérrez and Lozano covered 29 countries, including Bulgaria and Slovakia.…”
Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same can be seen in the sawmill studies, where each sawmill is considered a DMU (Yin 1998). Another common approach is to pool data for the same districts or units over a number of years, so the number of DMUs increases (Diaz-Balteiro et al 2006;Kovalčík 2020;Gutiérrez and Lozano 2020). Bogetoft et al (2003) and LeBel (1996) pooled data over 3 and 6 years, respectively, so that a contractor's annual performance represented a DMU.…”
Section: Choice Of Dmus and Inputs And Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%