Cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index questionnaire in Spanish (UWRI-S)

Bunster, Josefina; Martínez, María; Mauri-Stecca, Manuel Vicente; Leppe, Jaime; Nelson, Evan; Heiderscheit, Bryan C.; Besomi, Manuela

doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.007

Cited by 5 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…187). This nding is consistent with a study conducted by Bunster et al [13] who reported that a weak correlation was observed between the Spanish version of UWRI and the numeric pain rating scale. In fact, this weak correlation might be attributable to the time frame that each self-reported measure uses [13].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Test-retest reliability is comparable to three other translated versions and the UWRI-Persian version. The internal consistency of the UWRI-Persian is higher than that of the English [11], Spanish [13] and Turkish [14] versions, with a Cronbach's α being 0.966 for the Persian version compared to 0.82, 0.87, and 0.84 for the other three translations, respectively. Although the internal consistency of all versions varied, all Cronbach's α were within the recommended acceptable to excellent values [35], The Cronbach's α of psychological response (0.92) in the Persian version was better than in the Spanish version (0.8) [13], whereas the Cronbach's α of running progression in the Spanish version (0.95) [13] was better than in the Persian version (0.887).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The UWRI evaluates critical elements runners use to monitor running ability when recovering from RRI [13]. The UWRI is a 9-item questionnaire that assesses running ability following an RRI.…”

Section: The University Of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Inde...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Symptom surveillance incorporates assessing and describing the psychological response (items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9). Running progression (items 6, 7 and 8) involves assessing different aspects of running through weekly volume, longest run distance, and running pace or speed [13].…”

Section: The University Of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Inde...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The UWRI is a simple, self-administered measurement tool and responds to changes in running function after an RRI. The original English version of the UWRI has been previously cross-culturally adapted to Spanish, German and Turkish [12][13][14]; but it has not yet been translated into Persian. Considering that there are several hundred million Persian speakers worldwide who also show great interest in running, adapting the UWRI into Persian may assist researchers to design appropriate rehabilitation and return to running programmes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Cross Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index

Sheikhi,

Akbari,

Heiderscheit

2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) was developed to evaluate running ability after a running-related injury. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the UWRI into Persian (UWRI-Persian) and to investigate its psychometric properties in patients with a running-related injury. Methods The UWRI-Persian was translated using the Beaton guidelines. One-hundred-and-seventy-three native Persian patients with running-related injuries were participated. The convergent validity of the UWRI-Persian was evaluated using the Pearson correlation with the pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ), Tampa scale for Kinesiophobia (TKS), and visual analogue scale (VAS). Test-retest reliability was tested among 64 patients who completed the form again after seven days. Results The UWRI-Persian showed excellent internal consistency for total score (α = 0.966). An excellent internal consistency (α = 0.922) was shown for psychological response and good internal consistency (α = 0.887) for running progression. The interclass correlation coefficient for the UWRI-Persian total scores was 0.965 (95% CI, 0.942 to 0.979), indicating high intra-rater reliability. The UWRI-Persian demonstrated a moderate correlation with the PSEQ (r = 0.425) and the TSK (r = 0.457). The UWRI-Persian showed a weak correlation with the VAS (r = 0.187). These findings suggest no floor or ceiling effects. Conclusions The UWRI is a reliable and valid tool for Persian-speaking patients with running-related injuries. The UWRI was successfully translated from English to Persian and demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency, validity and reliability with no floor or ceiling effects.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%