Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-Arabic)

Ismail, Mourad; Shorbagy, Khaled M. El; Mohamed, Ahmed R.; Griffin, Sharon

doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2020.04.006

Cited by 12 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The majority of the hypotheses specified in the methodology were proven. The findings show that the psychometric properties of the WOSI-PL correspond to those reported for the original version of the tool and WOSI adaptations developed in other countries [ 3 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. A summary of the psychometric properties of all language versions of the WOSI questionnaire is shown in Table S1 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 67%

“…The WOSI is one of most frequently used questionnaires for shoulder instability with very good psychometric properties [ 6 , 8 ]. It has been validated in twelve languages and in fourteen cultures so far [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Bejer et al, (2019) published the results of the translation and cultural adaptation of the WOSI into Polish [ 26 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whittle et al, in their systematic review, also strongly recommend using WOSI for patients with shoulder instability [ 6 ]. To our knowledge, the WOSI has been translated to Swedish [ 9 ], German [ 10 , 11 ], Japanese [ 12 ], Italian [ 13 ], Brazilian, Portuguese [ 14 ], Dutch [ 15 , 16 ], French—validated on a Canadian and Swiss population [ 17 ], Spanish [ 18 ], Danish [ 19 ], French—validated on a French population [ 20 ], Turkish [ 21 ], Hebrew [ 22 ], Arabic [ 23 , 24 ] and European Portuguese [ 25 ]. In Poland, translation and cultural adaptation of the WOSI was conducted by Bejer et al, in 2019 [ 26 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Polish Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-PL) in Patients after Arthroscopic Repair for Shoulder Instability

Bejer

Płocki

Kulczyk³

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Apart from imaging and physical examination for shoulder instability (SI), medical history with patient feedback should be considered to assess the patient’s condition and recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Polish version of Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)—one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measures for SI. During examination 1, 74 patients after arthroscopic repair for SI (age = 30.01 ± 8.98) were tested. Examinations 2 and 3 involved 71 and 51 patients, respectively. They completed the Polish version of the WOSI, the shortened version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), the Short Form-36 version 2.0 (SF-36 v. 2.0) and 7-point Global Rating Change scale (GRC). The WOSI-PL demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha for total = 0.94), and test–retest reliability (Total ICC2,1 = 0.99). High construct validity was found (89%) as the a priori hypotheses were confirmed. All domains and total scores of WOSI-PL showed a moderate to strong degree of responsiveness (ES = 0.37–0.44; SMR = 0.87–1.26). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Total WOSI-PL was 126.43 points/6% (95%CI 67.83–185.03) by the anchor-based method and 174.05 points/8% (95%CI 138.61–233.98) by the distribution-based method. The Polish version of the WOSI can be considered a reliable, valid and responsive PROM. It is recommended for assessing the quality of life in patients after arthroscopic repair for SI and can be applied in research and in the clinical setting for monitoring treatment and facilitating patient-centred therapeutic decisions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 67%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Polish Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-PL) in Patients after Arthroscopic Repair for Shoulder Instability

Bejer

Płocki

Kulczyk³

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Psychometric tests showed that each item of the experience scale had a good degree of discrimination, so all items were retained in the simplified Chinese version. Cronbach’s alpha for the scale of six simulation cases were between 0.81–0.91, indicating excellent reliability [ 26 ]; despite the limited sample size, data from each case were reliable. The ICC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.64–0.98) indicating good reliability [ 23 ], indicating that data collected from the six simulation cases were reliable for analysis [ 26 , 27 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cronbach’s alpha for the scale of six simulation cases were between 0.81–0.91, indicating excellent reliability [ 26 ]; despite the limited sample size, data from each case were reliable. The ICC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.64–0.98) indicating good reliability [ 23 ], indicating that data collected from the six simulation cases were reliable for analysis [ 26 , 27 ]. The simplified Chinese version DES showed good potential in discriminating nursing students’ experiences of debriefing.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study

Xie

Liu

et al. 2022

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Debriefing Experience Scale (DES) is a tool that is used to explore nursing students’ subjective experiences during a debriefing and to help determine best debriefing practices. A Chinese version of the scale has not been found; its development can enhance learning in simulation activites in Chinese healthcare education programs. Methods A simplified Chinese version of the DES was developed and tested using 34 Chinese undergraduate (second year) nursing students. They participated in six simulation scenarios and debriefings. Eight experts were consulted to determine the content validity of the scale. Critical ratio method, Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient, correlation coefficient and factor analysis were used in testing the psychometric properties of the scale. Results Analysis of 200 scales showed that the simplified Chinese version of the DES had good potential in discriminatiing Chinese nursing students’ experiences of debriefing. Conclusions The simplified Chinese DES was effective in evaluating the experience of debriefing. A larger sample size and multicenter research is needed to confirm these findings.

show abstract

Comments on: “Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-Arabic)‿ by MM Ismail, KM El Shorbagy, AR Mohamed, SH Griffin published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(6):1135–1139

Özden

2021

Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-Arabic)

Cited by 12 publications

References 26 publications

Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Polish Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-PL) in Patients after Arthroscopic Repair for Shoulder Instability

Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Polish Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-PL) in Patients after Arthroscopic Repair for Shoulder Instability

Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study

Comments on: “Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-Arabic)‿ by MM Ismail, KM El Shorbagy, AR Mohamed, SH Griffin published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(6):1135–1139

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About