Cross-cultural adaptation of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-NL): Internal consistency, validity, repeatability and responsiveness

Reininga, Inge H. F.; Moumni, Mostafa El; Bulstra, Sjoerd K.; Olthof, Maurits Geert Laurent; Wendt, Klaus W.; Stevens, Martin

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.013

Cited by 37 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-NL) is a measure of musculoskeletal disability [11][12][13]. The questionnaire can be applied as 1 comprehensive score (SMFA-Total) or it may be divided in 2 parts, the Function Index (FI) and the Bother Index (BI).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disability and depression after orthopaedic trauma

Nota

Bot

Ring

et al. 2015

Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disability and depression after orthopaedic trauma

Nota

Bot

Ring

et al. 2015

Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Furthermore, in the Spanish and Dutch versions, analysis of the correlation with the SF-36 after categorizing the SMFA into three types of indexes revealed that, the upper extremity index had a relatively low correlation with the SF-36. This was because the SF-36 mainly includes items related to the dysfunction of the lower extremity8 ) . It was also reported in the Chinese16 ) and Dutch versions8 ) that the SMFA showed signification correlations not only with the SF-36 but also with other region-specific questionnaires such as the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, and the Foot Function Index .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Disease or region-specific questionnaires have been created to evaluate results following musculoskeletal injury/disorder treatments3,4,5,6,7 ) . However, it is difficult to compare patients with multiple injuries with different groups of patients8 ) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Translations of existing English-language questionnaires must be validated to deliver the same meaning as well as to ensure comparability of data12 ) . The SMFA has already been translated and adapted into different languages, including Dutch8 ) , Swedish11 ) , Brazilian Portuguese13 ) , German14 ) , Spanish15 ) , and Chinese16 ) , with validated reliability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire for patients with musculoskeletal disorder

Jung

et al. 2016

J Phys Ther Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire, which was translated into Korean, for patients with musculoskeletal disorder. [Subjects and Methods] Fifty-five subjects (26 males and 29 females) with musculoskeletal diseases participated in the study. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire focuses on a limited range of physical functions and includes a dysfunction index and a bother index. Reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and validity was examined by correlating short musculoskeletal function assessment scores with the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score. [Results] The reliability was 0.97 for the dysfunction index and 0.94 for the bother index. Validity was established by comparison with Korean version of the SF-36. [Conclusion] This study demonstrated that the Korean version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of musculoskeletal disorders.

show abstract

“…Numerous generic and regionspecific instruments are available. [1][2][3][4][5][6] A frequently used instrument for assessing outcome after ankle and hindfoot injuries is…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score is among the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. A valid Dutch version of this instrument is currently not available. Such a translated and validated instrument would allow objective comparison across hospitals or between patient groups, and with shown validity and reliability it may become a quality of care indicator in future. The main aims of this study are to translate and culturally adapt the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score questionnaire into Dutch according to international guidelines, and to evaluate the measurement properties of the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score-Dutch language version (DLV) in patients with a unilateral ankle or hindfoot fracture.Methods and analysisThe design of the study will be a multicentre prospective observational study (case series) in patients who presented to the emergency department with a unilateral ankle or hindfoot fracture or (fracture) dislocation. A research physician or research assistant will complete the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score-DLV based on interview for the subjective part and a physical examination for the objective part. In addition, patients will be asked to complete the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Descriptive statistics (including floor and ceiling effects), internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility (ie, test–retest reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change) and responsiveness will be assessed for the AOFAS DLV.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been exempted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Erasmus MC (Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Each participant will provide written consent to participate and remain anonymised during the study. The results of the study are planned to be published in an international, peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNTR5613. pre-result.

show abstract

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-NL): Internal consistency, validity, repeatability and responsiveness

Cited by 37 publications

References 28 publications

Disability and depression after orthopaedic trauma

Disability and depression after orthopaedic trauma

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire for patients with musculoskeletal disorder

American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About