Cross‐cultural adaptation of the Sensory Profile: establishing linguistic equivalency of the Hebrew version

Abstract

In the process of translating assessment tools from one language to another, researchers often run the risk of altering the intended meaning of the test items, and consequently affecting the validity of the assessment tool. In this study, the accuracy of a Hebrew translation of the Sensory Profile (Dunn, 1999) was validated. A multi-step process, based on back-translation and the bilingual method was undertaken to examine whether the Hebrew translation was linguistically equivalent to the original Sensory Profile. Quantitative and qualitative measures were used to detect and explain inconsistencies in the translation. The analysis of the back-translation revealed that the discrepancies found in a number of items stemmed from inaccurate translation or back-translation, erroneous substitution, omission, or addition of words/phrases, and from substitution of words/phrases because there was no equivalent in the Hebrew language. Of the 59 back-translated items, which were not linguistically equivalent to the original Sensory Profile items, only 12 items generated inconsistent responses by the bilingual parents. Overall, the responses of the bilingual parents to the Hebrew and the English version were inconsistent in 26 of the 125 Sensory Profile items. The coefficient alpha values in all sections of the Hebrew version (except for section N) were above.70, indicating a good overall reliability. Based on proposed criteria, results indicate that the Hebrew translation of the Sensory Profile is accurate. Inconsistencies found in a number of items may relate to connotation effect, language effect, and measurement errors.

The relationship between sensory processing, childhood rituals and obsessive–compulsive symptoms

“…A high overall score on the scale indicates a high frequency of strong responses to everyday sensory events. The questionnaire was translated to Hebrew using backtranslation (Neuman, Greenberg, Labovitz, & Suzuki, 2004) and…”

Patterns of response to sensory stimuli encountered in daily activities: a comparison between 3–10‐year‐old Israeli and American children without disabilities

“…The findings suggested that the Hebrew translation conveyed the intended meaning of the original English version of the Sensory Profile. The internal consistency, estimated with coefficient alpha, ranged from 0.64 to 0.96 in the various sections of the Hebrew version (Neuman et al, 2004). These coefficients were comparable to those reported for the original English version of the Sensory Profile, i.e.…”

“…The child's sum of scores for each section can fall into one of the three performance categories: Typical Performance, Probable Difference, or Definite Difference, indicating typical response, a potential problem, or a problem in sensory processing, respectively. The process of translating the Sensory Profile into Hebrew and validating its accuracy is described in detail elsewhere (Neuman et al, 2004). Briefly, the Hebrew translation of the Sensory Profile was first reviewed by Israeli occupational therapists and was then filled out by Israeli parents.…”

Early Screening of the Autism Spectrum Disorders: Validity Properties and Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the First Year Inventory in Italy

“…Indeed, when the paediatrician participation was obtained, on their side, parents easily agreed to be participants. It is highly likely that parental participation depends on the quality of their relationship with the paediatrician, as found by others [42,43]. This also means that a way to establish a continuous screening for children's mental health and speed up early diagnosis and intervention is increasing health professionals' awareness of that aspect.…”