2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural adaptations of the oral health impact profile – An assessment of global availability of 4-dimensional oral health impact characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 However, many studies have reported that this seven-domain structure seems to be pragmatic. [25][26][27] Instead, the set of four dimensions Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact were identified as clinically more conceivable and psychometrically sound structure for OHIP. Hence, in the present study we followed the recommendations given by John et al 28 and divided the OHIP-14 items into the above mentioned four domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 However, many studies have reported that this seven-domain structure seems to be pragmatic. [25][26][27] Instead, the set of four dimensions Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact were identified as clinically more conceivable and psychometrically sound structure for OHIP. Hence, in the present study we followed the recommendations given by John et al 28 and divided the OHIP-14 items into the above mentioned four domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the several versions of available OHIP, OHIP‐49, and OHIP‐14 items assigned into seven attributes have been most extensively used in research 24 . However, many studies have reported that this seven‐domain structure seems to be pragmatic 25–27 . Instead, the set of four dimensions Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact were identified as clinically more conceivable and psychometrically sound structure for OHIP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of items on the scales may vary, and different scales may concentrate on various demographics and dimensions. The OHIP is the most commonly used scale, and its condensed version, known as OHIP-14, has gained widespread acceptance due to its condensed nature and excellent clinical applicability [ 11 , 12 ]. OHIP-14, for example, can be used in edentulous subjects [ 13 ] and responds to 3 dimensions of oral health: functional limitation, pain discomfort, and psychosocial impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate psychometric properties of the original OHIP-49 version have been proven in many studies carried out in different cultures and in numerous different spoken languages ( 5 ), contributing to the high reputation of the instrument among oral health researchers in different cultures. It was also translated from the English to the Macedonian language, with an evaluation of its psychometric properties, which confirmed good psychometric properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%