Cross-cultural differences in information processing of chatbot journalism: chatbot news service as a cultural artifact

Abstract

PurposeHow does algorithmic information processing affect the thoughts and behavior of artificial intelligence (AI) users? In this study, the authors address this question by focusing on algorithm-based chatbots and examine the influence of culture on algorithms as a form of digital intermediation.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a study comparing the United States (US) and Japan to examine how users in the two countries perceive the features of chatbot services and how the perceived features affect user trust and emotion.FindingsClear differences emerged after comparing algorithmic information processes involved in using and interacting with chatbots. Major attitudes toward chatbots are similar between the two cultures, although the weights placed on qualities differ. Japanese users put more weight on the functional qualities of chatbots, and US users place greater emphasis on non-functional qualities of algorithms in chatbots. US users appear more likely to anthropomorphize and accept explanations of algorithmic features than Japanese users.Research limitations/implicationsDifferent patterns of chatbot news adoption reveal that the acceptance of chatbots involves a cultural dimension as the algorithms reflect the values and interests of their constituencies. How users perceive chatbots and how they consume and interact with the chatbots depends on the cultural context in which the experience is situated.Originality/valueA comparative juxtaposition of cultural-algorithmic interactions offers a useful way to examine how cultural values influence user behaviors and identify factors that influence attitude and user acceptance. Results imply that chatbots can be a cultural artifact, and chatbot journalism (CJ) can be a socially contextualized practice that is driven by the user's input and behavior, which are reflections of cultural values and practices.

Understanding Public Perceptions of AI Conversational Agents: A Cross-Cultural Analysis

“…This presents a signicant research gap, especially considering the widespread applications of CAs in the daily lives of millions. While the existing research is valuable, it often narrows in scope, targeting perceptions of CAs in specialized domains such as customer services [113], journalism [97] and healthcare [62]. Additionally, the emphasis is often placed on specic CA products, such as Alexa [35,85], Replika [112], and Xiaoice [120].…”

“…For example, people's perceptions and expectations of these non-human agents can be inuenced by the design features of the CAs, the unique characteristics of individual users, and the contexts and scenarios in which CAs were deployed and embraced [3,35,51,91,117]. While these studies have provided valuable insights, much of our current understanding is based on the examination of specic CA products that may be idiosyncratic due to their unique features [85,100], or domain-specic CAs with particular applications [97,98].…”

Developing Responsible Chatbots for Financial Services: A Pattern-Oriented Responsible Artificial Intelligence Engineering Approach

“…Despite the increasing popularity of chatbots, people have many ethical concerns about chatbots. Some studies on chatbots have begun to emerge, such as human trust and emotion [10], [11], [12]. Significant efforts have been put on algorithm-level solutions which mainly focus on a subset of ethical principles [13], [14], [15], [16], such as privacy, fairness, and explainability.…”

Integrating Chatbot Media Automations in Professional Journalism: An Evaluation Framework

“…Different parties have attempted Overall, a variety of literature exists in the realm of chatbot usage, specifically for journalistic purposes. Researchers over the years have covered a wide spectrum of chatbot applications in the field and have tackled issues like their usage in automated news dissemination [11,22,35], information gathering [34], user newsfeed personalization [23], as well as the use of conversational agents to establish a multi-media approach in the news [33,36], or as a means of studying the relationship between the journalist and the audience [37] as well as the cross-cultural social context those bots are being employed in [38]. Despite that, however, the majority of this research-with only a few notable exceptions-seems to focus more on the potential practical uses of these programs and less on a valid framework with which chatbot creation tools can be evaluated.…”