Cross-cultural research and positive organizational scholarship

Abstract

Purpose In view of the emphasis in cross-cultural research on negative factors such as cultural misfit, cultural distance, and the liability of foreignness, the purpose of this paper is to offer one explanation for why this is the case and highlight the advantages of giving at least equal emphasis to research on positive factors. Three propositions are offered to guide future cross-cultural research. Design/methodology/approach Summaries of empirical studies on the inherent inclinations of human systems toward the negative, as well as inclinations toward the positive, produce explanations for each of these biases and their implications for cross-cultural scholarship. Findings By prioritizing positive factors instead of negative factors, individuals and organizations perform at much higher levels than when the reverse is the case. Virtuous practices, in particular, are associated with positively deviant performance. Inasmuch as virtuousness is universally valued, its emphasis can address some of the liabilities of difference inherent in cross-cultural contexts. Originality/value The three propositions offered in the paper explain why negative biases exist, how positive biases provide an advantage to individuals and organizations, and highlight future directions for cross-cultural research. Social scientists have been challenged to help enable 51 percent of the world’s population to flourish by mid-century, and prioritizing positive cross-cultural phenomena is one prescription for achieving that objective.

When the ‘well-oiled machine’ meets the ‘pyramid of people:’ Role perceptions and hybrid working practices of middle managers in a binational organization – ARTE

“…If cultural differences are not perceived and understood, it is not possible to combine them constructively and synergistically. This is in line with some recent research propositions concerning negotiated meanings (Primecz et al, 2011) and complementary and positive effects of culture in CCM research (Barmeyer and Davoine, 2019; Barmeyer and Franklin, 2016; Stahl et al, 2017) and the relationship between CCM research and positive organizational scholarship (Cameron, 2017).…”

Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities of Conducting a Collaborative Research Course in an International University Partnership: A Study Case Between Kansas State University and Tallinn University of Technology

“…The overall learning outcomes obtained positive scores, which demonstrate that students from different universities can accomplish relevant international research when they focus on how to overcome the barriers and create synergy between colleagues (Cameron, ). The guidance and knowledge from the different professors at both universities encouraged and facilitated the students' performance on the final reports and outcomes.…”

Does “CHALTA HAI”culture negatively impacts sustainability of business firms in India? An empirical investigation

“…Indonesia and Thailand have also had strong growth. Experts argue that successful development in a dynamic growing market depends on how effective firms are at enhancing skills in relationship management (Chen et al, 2011;Jensen, 2012;Cameron, 2017). As already mentioned, a dyadic stable relationship has been considered a sine qua non for economic growth (Bhat, 2018), which can be ensured by tightening cooperation and linkage of partnerships among business stakeholders so far as issues related to business affairs are concerned.…”