2020
DOI: 10.1177/0886260520966672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross–cultural Validity of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire Among Adults Across Five Countries

Abstract: This study aims to test psychometric properties and factor invariance of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) for adults across five countries: Serbia ( N = 409), Mauritius ( N = 400), the United States ( N = 389), the Netherlands ( N = 372), and China ( N = 325). The results supported the two–factor structure across country samples, with a marginal model fit in Mauritius. Results also supported the congruent factor structure of Reactive Aggression scale across countries, while the Proactive A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cronbach's alphas for the RPQ total and subscales ranged from .874 to .936 (MICs = .387-.436). The M (i.e., 12.20) was slightly higher than that of general populations reported from crosscultural studies (e.g., Dinić et al, 2020;Tuvblad et al, 2016). The BES showed acceptable internal consistency (αs = .677-756; MICs = .127-261), and the M ± SDs were comparable with those in german incarcerated juvenile (Heynen et al, 2016; that is, M average across items = 3.47 ± 0.77 for cognitive empathy; M average across items = 3.13 ± 0.73 for cognitive empathy).…”
Section: Psychometric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The Cronbach's alphas for the RPQ total and subscales ranged from .874 to .936 (MICs = .387-.436). The M (i.e., 12.20) was slightly higher than that of general populations reported from crosscultural studies (e.g., Dinić et al, 2020;Tuvblad et al, 2016). The BES showed acceptable internal consistency (αs = .677-756; MICs = .127-261), and the M ± SDs were comparable with those in german incarcerated juvenile (Heynen et al, 2016; that is, M average across items = 3.47 ± 0.77 for cognitive empathy; M average across items = 3.13 ± 0.73 for cognitive empathy).…”
Section: Psychometric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The aggressive tendency among participants was determined by the Reactive-Proactive Questionnaire (RPQ), which is a 23-item questionnaire that consists of reactive aggression (11 items) and proactive aggression (12 items) subscales with great validity and reliability ( Cima et al, 2013 ; Dinić et al, 2020 ). Participants were requested to choose the occurrence frequency (from 0 represents never to 2 represents often) with items, such as “gotten angry when others threatened you” (reactive) or “used force to obtain money or things from others” (proactive).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%