Cross Cultural Variation in Emotion Regulation: A Systematic Review

Abstract

A systematic review of literature on emotion regulation is carried out with the aim to identify, analyze and compare the commonly used emotion regulatory strategies (cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression) in individualistic and collectivistic cultures including Pakistan and to study outcomes of different emotion regulation strategies in culture specific context. A systematic search has been conducted for required articles which have been published between 1990 and 2015. Only those studies have been included in the review which reported either cognitive reappraisal or expressive suppression in their findings. Review indicates that individualistic cultures prefer emotional expression to regulate emotions while collectivistic cultures, such as in Pakistan, focus more on expressive suppression. Emotional suppression can cause mental disease, physiological illness, and poor social and psychological adjustment. To sum up, culture predicts whether individuals are motivated to express or suppress their emotions. Collectivist culture encourages greatest control on emotion expression

Expressive Writing and Well-Being in Chinese Emerging Adults: Is Emotion Regulation an Underlying Mechanism?

“…Likewise, expressive writers had an opportunity to reevaluate a traumatic event, which could be beneficial to mental health. The present findings also echoed with previous research (Ramzan & Amjad, 2017) in suggesting that expressive writers demonstrated a lower tendency to hide or suppress their preexisting emotions caused by a traumatic event. Given expressive writers were encouraged to privately express and disclose their emotions caused by the traumatic events, expressive suppression was reduced in the long run.…”

Racial and ethnic differences in emotion regulation: A systematic review

“…In this respect, future research would benefit from the identification of specific cultural factors (e.g., ethnic identity, acculturation, and values adherence) that may help to explain racial and ethnic differences in emotion regulation (Helms et al, 2005). Indeed, cultural values of collectivism and individualism have been tied to emotion regulation strategy implementation, with individualist cultures preferring expression of emotions and collectivistic cultures being more likely to apply emotional suppression (Ramzan & Amjad, 2017). These caveats may explain the mixed results of the current review which limit definitive conclusions.…”

Parenting Style, Child Emotion Regulation and Behavioral Problems: The Moderating Role of Cultural Values in Australia and Indonesia

“…This may be related to differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies between people from collectivist and individualist cultures. Emotion suppression is more emphasized in collectivist than individualist cultures, whereas emotion expressivity encouraged in individualist culture (Ramzan & Amjad, 2017). Children in individualist cultures are expected to be independent and emotionally expressive, whereas those in collectivist cultures are expected to consider other people, maintain social harmony and, therefore, suppress their negative emotions.…”