Cross-device gaze-supported point-to-point content transfer

Turner, Jayson; Bulling, Andreas; Alexander, Jason; Gellersen, Hans

doi:10.1145/2578153.2578155

Cited by 41 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is intended to work by looking at the location on the target device to apply it. Similar interaction techniques have been recently presented by Turner et al [31]. These use gaze to acquire an object from an out of reach or large display and place it on the target device (e.g., a tablet or a laptop).…”

Section: Proposed Application Categoriesmentioning

confidence: 96%

Select & Apply: understanding how users act upon objects across devices

Simeone

Chong

Sas

et al. 2015

Pers Ubiquit Comput

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As our interactions increasingly cut across diverse devices, we often encounter situations where we find information on one device but wish to use it on another device for instance a phone number spotted on a public display but wanted on a mobile. We conceptualise this problem as Select & Apply and contribute two user studies where we presented participants with eight different scenarios involving different device combinations, applications and data types. In the first, we used a think-aloud methodology to gain insights on how users currently accomplish such tasks and how they ideally would like to accomplish them. In the second, we conducted a focus group study to investigate which factors influence their actions. Results indicate shortcomings in present support for Select & Apply and contribute a better understanding of which factors affect cross-device interaction. text from a tablet to and applying it to a text field in a webpage on the screen; (b) a participant using of a Proximity technique to select information of an event shown on a public display and applying it to her calendar application.

show abstract

Section: Proposed Application Categoriesmentioning

confidence: 96%

Select & Apply: understanding how users act upon objects across devices

Simeone

Chong

Sas

et al. 2015

Pers Ubiquit Comput

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Touch received increased attention in recent time as a partner for gaze pointing ( [21][22][23][24][25]). As touch is prime input for smartphones and tablets, it is particularly useful for interaction over distance where users point by gaze on remote displays, and confirm by touch on their local device.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Gaze-based Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In both works, Gaze+touch was compared to head based pointing techniques, and indicated performance benefit for using Gaze+touch. Turner et al also investigated Gaze+touch with handheld and remote display, focusing on content transfer across devices ( [24,25]). They studied transfer techniques based on gaze pointing with varying touch actions, showing general user acceptance and the importance of visual feedback and eye-hand coordination.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Gaze-based Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A recent method to bring touch to remote displays is using the gaze modality as demonstrated in previous work ( [21][22][23][24][25]). The control of Gaze+touch is simple: users look at the target on the remote surface for selection, and perform touch gestures on the close-proximity surface.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…How does gaze selection affect the ease and familiarity of multitouch, and the quality of multi-finger and multi-hand interaction? Prior work compared Gaze+touch to head-movement based techniques [21,22], to touch in a theoretical analysis [14], and between Gaze+touch variations for content transfer [24,25] as well as large screens [23]. However, we are not aware of any work that empirically contrasted Gaze+touch to the default touch paradigm.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Gaze+touch vs. Touch: What’s the Trade-off When Using Gaze to Extend Touch to Remote Displays?

Pfeuffer

Alexander

Gellersen

2015

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Direct touch input is employed on many devices, but it is inherently restricted to displays that are reachable by the user. Gaze input as a mediator can extend touch to remote displays -using gaze for remote selection, and touch for local manipulation -but at what cost and benefit? In this paper, we investigate the potential trade-off with four experiments that empirically compare remote Gaze+touch to standard touch. Our experiments investigate dragging, rotation, and scaling tasks. Results indicate that Gaze+touch is, compared to touch, 1) equally fast and more accurate for rotation and scaling, 2) slower and less accurate for dragging, and 3) enables selection of smaller targets. Our participants confirm this trend, and are positive about the relaxed finger placement of Gaze+touch. Our experiments provide detailed performance characteristics to consider for the design of Gaze+touch interaction of remote displays. We further discuss insights into strengths and drawbacks in contrast to direct touch.

show abstract

Pupil detection for head-mounted eye tracking in the wild: an evaluation of the state of the art

Fuhl

Tonsen

Bulling

et al. 2016

Machine Vision and Applications

Self Cite

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robust and accurate detection of the pupil position is a key building block for head-mounted eye tracking and prerequisite for applications on top, such as gaze-based human-computer interaction or attention analysis. Despite a large body of work, detecting the pupil in images recorded under real-world conditions is challenging given significant variability in the eye appearance (e.g., illumination, reflections, occlusions, etc.), individual differences in eye physiology, as well as other sources of noise, such as contact lenses or make-up. In this paper we review six state-of-the-art pupil detection methods, namely ElSe (Fuhl et al. in Proceed-

show abstract

Cross-device gaze-supported point-to-point content transfer

Cited by 41 publications

References 25 publications

Select & Apply: understanding how users act upon objects across devices

Select & Apply: understanding how users act upon objects across devices

Gaze+touch vs. Touch: What’s the Trade-off When Using Gaze to Extend Touch to Remote Displays?

Pupil detection for head-mounted eye tracking in the wild: an evaluation of the state of the art

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About