2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Examination of Ultrafast Structural, Interfacial, and Carrier Dynamics of Supported Monolayer MoS2

Abstract: In this Letter, the ultrafast structural, interfacial, and carrier dynamics of monolayer MoS2 supported on sapphire are cross-examined by the combination of ultrafast electron diffraction (UED) and transient reflectivity techniques. The out-of-plane motions directly probed by reflection UED suggest a limited anisotropy in the atomic motions of monolayer MoS2, which is distinct from that of related materials such as graphene and WSe2. Besides thermal diffusion, the MoS2–sapphire interface exhibits structural dy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported risetime for the MSD following photoexcitation (i.e. the observed Debye-Waller decay of Bragg peak intensities) in the case of 1L-MoS 2 on sapphire is slower than reported here, 37,38 while the opposite is true for 1L-MoS 2 on SiO 2 . 39 This is as expected based on the dielectric constants of these substrate materials, providing additional evidence in support of our conclusions regarding dielectric screening of the electron-phonon interaction in 1L-MoS 2 .…”
Section: Dielectric Screening Of Epc In the 1l-mos 2 /Si:n Heterostru...contrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported risetime for the MSD following photoexcitation (i.e. the observed Debye-Waller decay of Bragg peak intensities) in the case of 1L-MoS 2 on sapphire is slower than reported here, 37,38 while the opposite is true for 1L-MoS 2 on SiO 2 . 39 This is as expected based on the dielectric constants of these substrate materials, providing additional evidence in support of our conclusions regarding dielectric screening of the electron-phonon interaction in 1L-MoS 2 .…”
Section: Dielectric Screening Of Epc In the 1l-mos 2 /Si:n Heterostru...contrasting
confidence: 65%
“…[29][30][31][32][33] To date, experimental investigations of EPC effects and nonequilibrium phonon dynamics in monolayer and few-layer TMDs have been limited to what can be learned about zone-centered optical phonons via conventional and time-resolved Raman spectroscopy [34][35][36] or averaged atomic meansquared displacements via UED. [37][38][39] The momentum selectivity of phonon emission and the time-dependent anisotropic phonon populations, expected throughout the Brillouin zone (BZ) of TMDs, 21,26 is hidden from view with these techniques. By contrast, UEDS provides momentum-resolved information on EPC and its modification due to (i) the dielectric environment, (ii) nonequilibrium phonon relaxation in 1L-MoS 2 (including anharmonic decay within the monolayer), and (iii) phonon transport to the underlying substrate as we show here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note the lack of notable intensity changes near the shadow edge (Figure 2a), which rules out the possibility of significant transient surface electric fields as the explanation for the observed diffraction changes (see the Supporting Information). 23 Because the elastic mean free path of 30 keV electrons in methanol is about 108 nm, only the layers within the top few nm are probed at the grazing incidence of ∼1°. Thus, timedependent experiments conducted with different film thicknesses allow the examination of the structural dynamics of 2D methanol assemblies at different distances above the solid− molecule interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) Atomic displacement relation to fluence and temperature in 1L-MoS 2 . Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Dynamic Pump−probe Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e) Three different diffraction planes at 1.2 ± 0.1 × 10 14 electrons/cm –2 at 400 nm excitation in MoSe 2 . Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Dynamic Pump−probe Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%