1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(90)90130-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-field particle transport in the edge plasma of tokamak TF-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the diffusivity values remain quite a lot higher than the neo-classical values and seem also to be due to the fluctuation-induced transport at the high-field (inboard) side limiter location (ρ = −1) in the Aditya tokamak. Strong fluctuations and turbulence transport have been reported in the high-field (inboard) region of the TF-1 tokamak [36]. Fluctuation reduction by a factor of 10 compared with the low-field (outboard) side have been observed in the high-field (inboard) side of the Alcator C-Mod tokamak [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the diffusivity values remain quite a lot higher than the neo-classical values and seem also to be due to the fluctuation-induced transport at the high-field (inboard) side limiter location (ρ = −1) in the Aditya tokamak. Strong fluctuations and turbulence transport have been reported in the high-field (inboard) region of the TF-1 tokamak [36]. Fluctuation reduction by a factor of 10 compared with the low-field (outboard) side have been observed in the high-field (inboard) side of the Alcator C-Mod tokamak [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is also observed in many diverted discharges that the measured fluctuation-induced flux is much too high to be consistent with global particle balance (DIII-D tokamak 23 , JET 36,22,26 ). Taken together, the above observations have led to the speculation that (3) there exists some inward particle transport mechanism that does not involve fine scale plasma turbulence such as large stationary convection cells, as suggested in some experiments [37][38][39][40] , and/or (4) there are large corrections that should be made to the fluctuation-induced flux estimate due to finite electron temperature fluctuations that are not being measured in many of these experiments, and/or (5) there exists a large poloidal asymmetry in the turbulent transport (ballooning hypothesis). However, with respect to speculation (4): Recent measurements in the Texas Experimental Tokamak-Upgrade (TEXT-U) 41 and in DIII-D 30 indicate that density and electron temperature fluctuations in the edge plasma tend to be in phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Turbulence properties regarding magnetic structure and magnetic curvature were studied in tokamaks TF-2 (Budaev et al. 1990), T-10 (Kirnev et al. 2005), HYBTOK-II (Budaev et al.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to the typical low-frequency turbulence range (see Zweben et al 2007). Turbulence properties regarding magnetic structure and magnetic curvature were studied in tokamaks TF-2 (Budaev et al 1990), T-10 (Kirnev et al 2005), HYBTOK-II (Budaev et al 2003) and the Large Helical Device (Ohno et al 2006). Turbulent fluxes, fluctuation level and turbulent spectra were measured in these toroidal plasma discharges at outboard and inboard sides (which are of different magnetic curvature) of the torus to reveal any differences in the property regarding magnetic curvature.…”
Section: Measurements In Fusion Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%