2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/bibm55620.2022.9995459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Field Transformer for Diabetic Retinopathy Grading on Two-field Fundus Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison methods : To validate the effectiveness of the proposed PACNet on grading DR task, we compare our approach with several typical classification and DR grading methods, for example, CANet [27], alexnet [45], mobilenet_v2 [46], densenet121 [47], VGG16 [48], ResNet‐50 [49], EfficientNet‐b0 [50], and CrossFiT [51]. For a fair comparison, we split our new dataset into two subsets by 10‐fold cross‐validation for all methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison methods : To validate the effectiveness of the proposed PACNet on grading DR task, we compare our approach with several typical classification and DR grading methods, for example, CANet [27], alexnet [45], mobilenet_v2 [46], densenet121 [47], VGG16 [48], ResNet‐50 [49], EfficientNet‐b0 [50], and CrossFiT [51]. For a fair comparison, we split our new dataset into two subsets by 10‐fold cross‐validation for all methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some improvements in the model for DR grading. Hou et al 5 proposed a Cross-Field Transformer (CrossFiT), which can effectively use dual-field correspondence to improve the DR grading performance. However, these methods have some problems because the features of DR are complex and variable, and it is difficult for a single-scale feature extractor to accurately extract all the lesion features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%