1993
DOI: 10.2307/3809290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Fostering New Zealand's Black Stilt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigated the factors influencing the length of the dependence period in released Montagu's Harriers, and compared it with that of birds which fledged naturally. Additionally, the resighting rates and location of naturally fledged and released birds, marked with patagial tags, were examined for differences in important movement patterns such as migration and philopatry (Reed et al 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigated the factors influencing the length of the dependence period in released Montagu's Harriers, and compared it with that of birds which fledged naturally. Additionally, the resighting rates and location of naturally fledged and released birds, marked with patagial tags, were examined for differences in important movement patterns such as migration and philopatry (Reed et al 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether chicks were placed in original or foster nests did not affect acceptance by parents. Acceptance of foster chicks appears to be common among many birds for which artificial incubation and chick placement has been attempted (Reed et al 1993, Lobo and Marini 2013). Adults may not, however, accept foster chicks if they are returned to the nest before the anticipated hatch date of original eggs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eggs within the incubator were monitored regularly for signs of hatching and returned to the original nest within 24 hours of hatching. If artificial eggs were lost, washed away, or buried, or if adults discontinued incubation before the collected eggs hatched, chicks were fostered into another headstart nest with a similar estimated hatch date (Reed et al 1993, Lobo and Marini 2013). After chicks were placed in the nest scrape, we observed nests to verify that adults accepted and brooded the returned chicks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When interactions with parents and exploration opportunities have been provided, no differences in the activity patterns and associations can be seen, as highlighted by research comparing the development of captive killdeer (Charadrius vociferous) cross-fostered to wild spotted sandpipers (Actitis macularia) and wild parent-reared killdeer [40] (Charadrius vociferous); Nonetheless, the use of fostering and cross-fostering alike has expected and unexpected fitness outcomes [41]. As a result, authors have advised against, and limited, the use of fostering as a husbandry technique for reintroduction programmes; due to the potential for unsuitable coping strategies and mate choice both in the wild and in captivity (e.g., [23,40,42]). However, the use of foster rearing techniques can be widespread for particular species across and within zoos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%