1972
DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(72)90023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-impact techniques in technology assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An impact can either lead to the mutation or has no effect, meanwhile a mutation can occur without any impact. In the context of our study, these relationships can be represented by means of the cross-impact analysis in Figure 13 [83][84][85][86][87][88] . At the impact level, P(2) is the probability of not occurring of an impact, and the P(2) is the probability of occurring of an impact.…”
Section: Cross-impact Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An impact can either lead to the mutation or has no effect, meanwhile a mutation can occur without any impact. In the context of our study, these relationships can be represented by means of the cross-impact analysis in Figure 13 [83][84][85][86][87][88] . At the impact level, P(2) is the probability of not occurring of an impact, and the P(2) is the probability of occurring of an impact.…”
Section: Cross-impact Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the computed value of p(i | j) by the likelihood ratio method, as shown in (3), can fall outside the acceptable range of [0, 1] for a probability [6]. This problem can arise if the computed conditional probability p(i | j) value violates the [0, 1] range on probabilities, or if the conditional and marginal probabilities, taken together, violate Bayes' Theorem.…”
Section: Computation Of Consistent Conditional Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Original Probability DE Revised Probability MC Revised Probability e (6) e (5) e (5) e (6) e (4) e (5) e(4) e (4) e (3) e (9) e (10) e (1) e (8) e (2) e (7) e (3) e (9) e (10) e (1) e (2) e (8) e (7) e (3) e (9) e (10) e (8) e (6) e (2) e (7) e(1) Figure 4: Comparison of expected impact ranking order for the 10 × 10 system.…”
Section: Ranking Order Experimentsunclassified
“…Firstly, we can use the cross-impact analysis to build a quantitative relationship between the increase/decrease of distribution probability after mutations and the clinical diagnosis, because the cross-impact analysis is particularly suited for two relevant events coupled together [35,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Figure 2 displays the cross-impact analysi tionship between changed primary structure and von Hippel-Lindau disease.…”
Section: Results and Dismentioning
confidence: 99%