2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross laminated timber (CLT) diaphragms under shear: Test configuration, properties and design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another different test setup, based on a particular configuration with orientation of 14 • in respect to the compression force, is presented in Brandner et al (2013) (from Hirschmann, 2011 which achieves shear failure in lamellas with a value f v,mean = 9 MPa. Another test which succeeded in obtaining shear failure in lamellas is the one presented in Brandner et al (2017) (taken also from Kreuzinger and Sieder, 2013;Dröscher, 2014;Brandner et al, 2015). It contemplates a compression test on a column specimen which has grain orientation at an angle in respect to the applied force; results are provided for a series tested at TU Graz and another at TU Munich, which are, respectively, f v,mean = 7, 3 MPa and f v,mean = 7, 6 MPa.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another different test setup, based on a particular configuration with orientation of 14 • in respect to the compression force, is presented in Brandner et al (2013) (from Hirschmann, 2011 which achieves shear failure in lamellas with a value f v,mean = 9 MPa. Another test which succeeded in obtaining shear failure in lamellas is the one presented in Brandner et al (2017) (taken also from Kreuzinger and Sieder, 2013;Dröscher, 2014;Brandner et al, 2015). It contemplates a compression test on a column specimen which has grain orientation at an angle in respect to the applied force; results are provided for a series tested at TU Graz and another at TU Munich, which are, respectively, f v,mean = 7, 3 MPa and f v,mean = 7, 6 MPa.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An equivalent shear modulus G eq which takes into account the number of layers, the total thickness of the panels and the width of boards is considered as proposed by Brandner et al [29]. Figure 3 shows the connection stiffnesses in the PM.…”
Section: The Plane Model -Pmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA e f f ,d = kGA gross (3) in which I gross and A gross are the gross moment of inertia and cross-sectional area of the beam and k is the shear correction factor. Since the shear correction factor of a laminated composite such as CLT and CLP is dependent on its layup and the properties of laminates [15], the effective shear stiffness is defined as kGA gross to avoid ambiguity.…”
Section: Modal Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, edge-gluing is not mandatory in CLT production [1]. The gaps in the non-edge-glued CLT panels not only can reduce the mechanical properties such as in-plane shear strength and modulus [2,3] but also are unfavorable to fire and building physics considerations. SCL is an important category of engineered wood product in North America, which includes laminated veneer lumber (LVL), laminated strand lumber (LSL), oriented strand lumber (OSL), and parallel strand lumber (PSL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%