2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2762078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Layer Design and Performance Analysis of Quality of Service Control Scheme for Wireless Body Area Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cross-layer approach is an important technique to optimize the QoS requirement of different types of data. In [46], the authors utilized a cross-layer design between the physical layer and MAC layers. Analyze and compare the performance of the QoS control scheme and standard scheme.…”
Section: Quality Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A cross-layer approach is an important technique to optimize the QoS requirement of different types of data. In [46], the authors utilized a cross-layer design between the physical layer and MAC layers. Analyze and compare the performance of the QoS control scheme and standard scheme.…”
Section: Quality Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluate the performance of the current protocol in terms of node mobility and loss. [46] CLD approach for QoS in WBAN…”
Section: Mac Layer and Physical Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this study and other works like [12, 19], in which techniques are devised to predict image patterns in intelligent vehicles, as well as in [16, 17, 20–22], the authors are able to suggest improvements in source coding to optimize the performance of these systems. In view of this, it is necessary to optimally map the packet loss, with application layer features (PSNR and MOS), which some authors regard as a Cross-Layer approach [23, 24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Rsym is the symbol rate; Lpreamble, LSFD, LPLCPheader, and LPSDU are the length of the preamble, SFD, PLCP header, and PSDU, respectively; Ptx and Prx are transmitter and receiver power consumption, respectively; and εenc and εdec are encoding and decoding energies, respectively [26,27,28,29,30,31].…”
Section: Integrated Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%