Cross-level effects of procedural justice perceptions on faculty trust

Graso, Maja; Jiang, Lixin; Probst, Tahira M.; Benson, Wendi L.

doi:10.1080/21515581.2014.966830

Cited by 9 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…And while it is tempting to suggest that there must be something in common among all such instances which justifies the use of the same word, i.e. trust, it is evident that differences in who is trusted and by whom, and the nature of the sphere in which trust subsists -the referents and context of trust -can mean that we are talking about different sorts of relationship (Fulmer and Gelfand, 2012;Graso, Jiang, Probst & Benson, 2014). This problem of theorizing across levels has led some researchers to make a distinction between organizational trust and institutional trust, the latter of which is a problematic term.…”

Section: Defining Organizational Trust: Common Themes and Common Probmentioning

confidence: 99%

Looking ‘Beyond the Factory Gates’: Towards more Pluralist and Radical Approaches to Intraorganizational Trust Research

Siebert

Martin

Božić

et al. 2015

Organization Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to suggest new avenues for trust research by critiquing the extant literature on this topic. We analyse the most influential research on intraorganizational trust from the perspective of a classic industrial sociology framework from the 1970s -Alan Fox's work on frames of reference and trust dynamics. Our analysis of intraorganizational trust studies leads us to three conclusions. First, the large majority of intraorganizational trust research has strong unitarist underpinnings, which support a managerial agenda that is potentially detrimental to employees' (and indeed managers') long-term interests. Second, most of this research fails to explain how trust in organizations is embedded in societal and field-level institutions, hence it would benefit from looking 'beyond the factory gates' for a more complete understanding of trust dynamics in organizations. In this connection, we argue that Fox's pluralist and radical perspectives, which are under-represented in intraorganizational trust research, could provide new lines of inquiry by locating internal trust relations in a wider institutional context. Third, Fox's explanation of how low and high trust dynamics in organizations are embedded in wider society may help address the concerns about undersocialized, endogenous explanations and open the way for structure-agency analyses of building, maintaining and repairing intraorganizational trust.

show abstract

Section: Defining Organizational Trust: Common Themes and Common Probmentioning

confidence: 99%

Looking ‘Beyond the Factory Gates’: Towards more Pluralist and Radical Approaches to Intraorganizational Trust Research

Siebert

Martin

Božić

et al. 2015

Organization Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are several factors, which may influence the outcome of quality graduate, and procedural fairness is one such factor (Graso et al, 2014). Kalay (2016) studied the impact of procedural justice on performance of teacher's of Karachi and Dhaka but did not find any significant relationship.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Intervening Influence of Interactional Justice between Procedural Justice and Job Performance: Evidence from South Asian Countries

Ashraf¹,

Vveinhardt²,

Ahmed³

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper investigates the intervening influence of interactional justice between procedural justice and job performance (task, contextual and adaptive performance) of the faculty members of Karachi (Pakistan) and Dhaka (Bangladesh) based government colleges by using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Data, for this study, has been collected through pre-designed close-ended questionnaire. The intervening variable fully mediated the relationship between procedural justice and job performance. The result of this study indicates that the performance of government college faculty members can be improved by ensuring fair procedures and dignified treatment of faculty members in the working environment. It can be concluded that teachers can accommodate harsh procedures, subject to courteously and fairly communicated. Significance of this study is that it has investigated the least researched areas in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Its findings can be helpful to the government and college administration while making and implementing policies for college education development in both countries.

show abstract

“…Quality graduates are acknowledged as the result of excellent teachers' contributions. Among several factors, interpersonal and informational aspects of justice are the factors that influence teachers' performance at higher educational institutions (Graso et al, 2014). Teachers anticipate fair treatment and a better work environment concerning the contribution and efforts they put into the organization (Kalay, 2016).…”

Section: Interpersonal and Informational Aspects Of Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Role of Interpersonal and Informational Justice in the Purview of Teaching Faculty’s Job Satisfaction

โคตรศรีวงค์

มงคลศรีสวัสดิ์

2021

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: This study was designed to assess the role of interpersonal and Informational Justice in the purview of teaching faculty’s job satisfaction. Methodology: A cross-sectional and quantitative research method was carried out in three randomly selected universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan i.e. Bacha Khan University, University of Malakand, and the University of Swat. A well-structured questionnaire was used for data collection from 217 sampled respondents (employees) for primary data collection. Further, the researchers analyzed the data through descriptive and inferential statistics, i.e. frequency, percentage, correlation, and indexation of the study variables, namely dependent (job satisfaction) and independent (Interpersonal and Informational Justice), respectively. Principal Findings: Regarding the demographic sketch of the sampled respondents, the study found that the majority of the respondents were male, having the age group from 31-40 years with the collaboration of 5-10 year experiences of teaching at the university level. Further, as per the correlation test statistics at bivariate analysis between the Interpersonal and Informational Justice with job satisfaction was found significant with strong correlation (P≤0.05; 0.860) respectively. Applications of this study: The government and administration should take positive steps to provide a good working environment to establish their trust by expanding cooperation towards employees, exploration of benefits, strengthening relationships with each other, and encouragement of open communication that can stimulate and encourage an exchange of view between faculty and administration was put forward some of the recommendations in light of the study findings. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research comes under the domain of Sociology of organization and sociology of work through the perceptional-based endeavor.

show abstract

Cross-level effects of procedural justice perceptions on faculty trust

Cited by 9 publications

References 60 publications

Looking ‘Beyond the Factory Gates’: Towards more Pluralist and Radical Approaches to Intraorganizational Trust Research

Looking ‘Beyond the Factory Gates’: Towards more Pluralist and Radical Approaches to Intraorganizational Trust Research

Exploring Intervening Influence of Interactional Justice between Procedural Justice and Job Performance: Evidence from South Asian Countries

Assessing the Role of Interpersonal and Informational Justice in the Purview of Teaching Faculty’s Job Satisfaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About