2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0700-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-linguistic differences in the use of durational cues for the segmentation of a novel language

Abstract: It is widely accepted that duration can be exploited as phonological phrase final lengthening in the segmentation of a novel language, i.e., in extracting discrete constituents from continuous speech. The use of final lengthening for segmentation and its facilitatory effect has been claimed to be universal. However, lengthening in the world languages can also mark lexically stressed syllables. Stress-induced lengthening can potentially be in conflict with right edge phonological phrase boundary lengthening. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants had acquired Basque in childhood after the age of 2 as their second language and were using it daily. We note that prior studies have not revealed differences between monolingual Spanish and bilingual Spanish‐Basque participants in the segmentation of statistical units in offline recognition tests . Also, to mitigate the possibility that individual differences related to bilingualism might influence statistical learning processes, we homogenized our sample by matching participants by proficiency and age of acquisition (2–3 years) of the second language, as well as the self‐reported extent of their daily exposure to and use of Basque.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants had acquired Basque in childhood after the age of 2 as their second language and were using it daily. We note that prior studies have not revealed differences between monolingual Spanish and bilingual Spanish‐Basque participants in the segmentation of statistical units in offline recognition tests . Also, to mitigate the possibility that individual differences related to bilingualism might influence statistical learning processes, we homogenized our sample by matching participants by proficiency and age of acquisition (2–3 years) of the second language, as well as the self‐reported extent of their daily exposure to and use of Basque.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, because syllables are important functional units in language processing (Geiser, Zaehle, Jancke, & Meyer, 2008;Levelt et al, 1999;MacNeilage, 1998;Ordin, Polyanskaya, Laka, & Nespor, 2017;Ramus et al, 1999), their neural representation should be characterized by more coherent neural dynamics and larger networks (including stronger connections with sensorimotor areas and associations with higher-order regions) compared to simple bi-or trigrams of letters.…”
Section: Neural Mechanisms Of Ssvepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unresolved question is which aspects of local variation in speech rate are universal ( 3 , 4 ), which vary across languages and cultures ( 5 ), and which vary across individuals ( 6 ). For example, marking the end of utterances by slowing down speech is cross-linguistically common, but its implementation is language-specific ( 7 ). Good candidates for truly universal temporal features are the relatively fast pronunciations of frequent, and thus predictable, words ( 8 ) and second mentions of words ( 9 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%