Interspeech 2017 2017
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2017-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Linguistic Distinctions Between Professional and Non-Professional Speaking Styles

Abstract: This work investigates acoustic and perceptual differences in four language varieties by using a corpus of professional and non-professional speaking styles. The professional stimuli are composed of excerpts of broadcast news and political discourses from six subjects in each case. The non-professional stimuli are made up of recordings of 10 subjects who read a long story and narrated it subsequently. All this material was obtained in four language varieties: Brazilian and European Portuguese, standard French … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) While the current study has analyzed data from one of the central domains of standard English usage in Trinidad, prosodic research based on data from other domains, such as media, business, or politics, possibly also including other speaking styles, would be worthwhile to investigate potential domain-specific differences (e.g., Deuber & Leung, 2013 : 311). (5) Considering the scarcity of prosodic research on TrinE (as opposed to TEC) in general, research focusing on the intonational phonology of TrinE is also needed, and phonetically driven research should be extended to account for other potential measures of the global distribution of F0 (e.g., Barbosa, Madueira, & Mareüil, 2017 ). Once phonological research on the intonation of TrinE is available, an investigation of pitch range linked to specific tones (e.g., Mennen et al, 2012 ) would also be desirable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) While the current study has analyzed data from one of the central domains of standard English usage in Trinidad, prosodic research based on data from other domains, such as media, business, or politics, possibly also including other speaking styles, would be worthwhile to investigate potential domain-specific differences (e.g., Deuber & Leung, 2013 : 311). (5) Considering the scarcity of prosodic research on TrinE (as opposed to TEC) in general, research focusing on the intonational phonology of TrinE is also needed, and phonetically driven research should be extended to account for other potential measures of the global distribution of F0 (e.g., Barbosa, Madueira, & Mareüil, 2017 ). Once phonological research on the intonation of TrinE is available, an investigation of pitch range linked to specific tones (e.g., Mennen et al, 2012 ) would also be desirable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a dedicated Praat script (available at https://osf.io/qkea5/) determined F0 at 20 ms time steps in Hertz (Hz); this is a modified version of the method used in Meer and Fuchs (2021), supplemented by additional measures adapted from Barbosa et al. (2017) and Cavalcanti et al. (forthcoming).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a dedicated Praat script (available at https://osf.io/qkea5/) determined F0 at 20 ms time steps in Hertz (Hz); this is a modified version of the method used in Meer and Fuchs (2021), supplemented by additional measures adapted from Barbosa et al (2017) and Cavalcanti et al (forthcoming). Frequency in Hz was additionally converted to semitones (st) with the formula 12 * log2(freq), that is, 12 times the binary logarithm of F0 in Hz, relative to 1 Hz.…”
Section: Acoustic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But, above all, they are defined prosodically. Reading news in the media is such a setting (COTTER, 1993;BARBOSA et al, 2017), as well as praying or preaching in church (NIEBUHR; SCHJOEDT, 2019;FELEVE;FAJOBI, 2019), telling a story (WICHMANN, 2021;BARBOSA et al, 2017), talking to babies/children, i.e., motherese (BIER-SACK et al, 2017) -or giving a speech (ATKINSON, 2004;SOORJOO, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%