2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-linked polymeric ionic liquids ion gel electrolytes by in situ radical polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The broad peak appearing at 2941 cm −1 is associated with the asymmetric C−H stretching. The sharp peak located at 1647 cm −1 is assigned to the C=O stretching of carboxyl group [ 36 ]. The appearance of peaks in the region of 1562 cm −1 could be assigned to the strong C=C stretching vibration from α, β-unsaturated ketone of the polymer composites [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad peak appearing at 2941 cm −1 is associated with the asymmetric C−H stretching. The sharp peak located at 1647 cm −1 is assigned to the C=O stretching of carboxyl group [ 36 ]. The appearance of peaks in the region of 1562 cm −1 could be assigned to the strong C=C stretching vibration from α, β-unsaturated ketone of the polymer composites [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other SNP‐ x electrolytes also showed similar T g as shown in Figure S3 (Supporting Information), which means that the content of ETPTA does not significantly change the T g of SNP‐ x electrolytes with co‐solvent content ranges from 54 wt % to 43 wt %. Low crystallinity can produce large free volume and improve the mobility of polymer segments in polymer electrolyte, [3a,20] and a low T g of polymer matrix benefits to enhance the ionic conduction of the quasi‐solid polymer electrolyte. Furthermore, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve (Figure S4, Supporting Information) shows that the thermal stability of SNP‐30 electrolyte is significantly higher than that of liquid electrolyte (LE, 1.0 M LiPF 6 in EC/DMC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two absorption peaks at 1619 and 1637 cm −1 correspond to the stretching vibration of acrylic C=C bonds (1610–1650 cm −1 ) in ETPTA monomer [19] . After UV‐irradiation, the absorption peaks of C=C bonds disappeared, while the absorption peaks at other positions did not change, indicating successful photo‐polymerization of the ETPTA monomer [20] . In addition, the solidifying process of SNP electrolyte was tracked by impedance measurement, as shown in Figure S2 (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, suppression of crystallinity, along with increasing the percentage of the amorphous phase in the PEO matrix, is the design criterion for PEO-based electrolyte. Numerous approaches, that is, dispersion of inorganic fillers, such as SiO 2, 5 TiO 2, 6 Al 2 O 3, 7,8 ZrO 2, 9 MMT, 10 etc, blending the polymer with liquid plasticizers, [11][12][13][14][15][16] mingling with other polymers, 17,18 crosslinking of polymers, 19 copolymerization, 20 etc, have been employed to improve the ionic conductivity of PEO-based electrolytes. It has been observed that incorporation of the liquid plasticizers, such as aprotic carbonated solvents and room temperature ionic liquids (ILs), in the polymer matrices is an effective means to improve the conductivity of those polymer electrolytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, suppression of crystallinity, along with increasing the percentage of the amorphous phase in the PEO matrix, is the design criterion for PEO‐based electrolyte. Numerous approaches, that is, dispersion of inorganic fillers, such as SiO 2, 5 TiO 2, 6 Al 2 O 3, 7,8 ZrO 2, 9 MMT, 10 etc, blending the polymer with liquid plasticizers, 11‐16 mingling with other polymers, 17,18 crosslinking of polymers, 19 copolymerization, 20 etc, have been employed to improve the ionic conductivity of PEO‐based electrolytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%