2016
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐linking in children with keratoconus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Keratoconus can behave more aggressively in pediatric than in adult patients. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effectiveness of corneal collagen cross‐linking (CXL) in children. For this study, MEDLINE® and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies examining the effects of standard, trans‐epithelial or accelerated CXL protocols in patients age 18 years or younger. Primary outcomes were; uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax) and secondary outcomes were;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
43
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer-term studies are needed to evaluate its ultimate effectiveness. 101 The plethora of international clinical data supports the use of CXL in the early…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer-term studies are needed to evaluate its ultimate effectiveness. 101 The plethora of international clinical data supports the use of CXL in the early…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding disease stabilization, in light of the results published, it appears that cross-linking (CXL) is effective in slowing down progression in the pediatric population, [6][7][8] although some patients (around 20% 8 ) might require retreatment. An important question to consider is whether this procedure should be carried out in all cases of pediatric keratoconus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(28) Recent studies confirm the treatment's effectiveness, as well as the significant improvement of topographic features and visual acuity. [29][30] However, further monitoring suggests that despite initial improvement, pediatric patients may present long-term progression. 31 Additional studies are still needed and should focus on the development of appropriate techniques and protocol, not only to obtain lasting and effective results, but principally to ensure the safety of patients in pediatric age.…”
Section: Scientific Evidence Of Treatment Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%