2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16808-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Modal Face Matching: Beyond Viewed Sketches

Abstract: Abstract. Matching face images across different modalities is a challenging open problem for various reasons, notably feature heterogeneity, and particularly in the case of sketch recognition -abstraction, exaggeration and distortion. Existing studies have attempted to address this task by engineering invariant features, or learning a common subspace between the modalities. In this paper, we take a different approach and explore learning a mid-level representation within each domain that allows faces in each m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike linear methods based on averaging, concatenation, linear subspace learning [8,27], or LDA [3], our fusion method is non-linear, which is more powerful to model complex problems. Furthermore, comparing with other first-order non-linear methods based on element-wise combinations only [28], our method is higher order: it accounts for all interactions between each pair of feature channels in both views.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike linear methods based on averaging, concatenation, linear subspace learning [8,27], or LDA [3], our fusion method is non-linear, which is more powerful to model complex problems. Furthermore, comparing with other first-order non-linear methods based on element-wise combinations only [28], our method is higher order: it accounts for all interactions between each pair of feature channels in both views.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detected facial attributes can be applied directly to authentication. Facial attributes have been applied to enhance face verification, primarily in the case of cross-modal matching, by filtering [19,54] (requiring potential FRF matches to have the correct gender, for example), model switching [18], or aggregation with conventional features [27,17]. [21] defines 65 facial attributes and proposes binary attribute classifiers to predict their presence or absence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baselines (fine-grained SBIR): We evaluate against when singular feature representations are used: (i) Part-HOG, where part-level HOG is employed, (ii) Part-Attribute, where only automatically detected partaware attributes are utilized, and (iii) Part-Structure, where geometric part structure alone is used to retrieve. We also adopt the state-of-the-art two-view CCA method previously utilized to match facial sketches and caricatures to mugshot photo [25]. We compare with three pair-wise configurations to accommodate their two-view setting: Part-HOG+Part-Attribute+2View-CCA, Part-HOG+Part-Structure+2View-CCA and Table 1.…”
Section: Baselines (Attribute Detection)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also employed some soft biometric traits such as gender, ethnicity, and skin color to reorder the ranked list of the suspects. Ouyang et al [27] introduced a framework to combine the facial attributes with low-level features to fill the gap between sketch and photo modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%