2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-018-1054-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-modality deep learning-based prediction of TAP binding and naturally processed peptide

Abstract: Epitopes presented on MHC class I molecules pass multiple processing stages before their presentation on MHC molecules, the main ones being proteasomal cleavage and TAP binding. Transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) binding is a necessary stage for most, but not all, MHC-I-binding peptides. The molecular determinants of TAP-binding peptides can be experimentally estimated from binding experiments and from the properties of peptides inducing a CD8 T cell response. We here propose novel optimizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the TAP binding ability was predicted through Besser H’s work 41 with default parameters. The output IC 50 value was used as the TAP score (T).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the TAP binding ability was predicted through Besser H’s work 41 with default parameters. The output IC 50 value was used as the TAP score (T).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the majority of peptides presented by MHC class I are 9-mers, we discarded all fragments shorter than nine amino acids long, while fragments longer than nine amino acids were subdivided into all possible overlapping 9-mer combinations. Since the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) binding is a needed stage for most MHC-I-binding peptides, we used an online server that applied the model described by Besser and Louzoun [80] to estimate the TAP binding affinity of the predicted peptides. Finally, we used an IEDB MHC I binding prediction tool to predict which peptides would bind more effectively to pig MHC I complex [51].…”
Section: Prediction Of Cd8 + T-cell Epitopesmentioning
confidence: 99%