Cross-Modality Information Transfer: A Hypothesis about the Relationship among Prehistoric Cave Paintings, Symbolic Thinking, and the Emergence of Language

Abstract

Early modern humans developed mental capabilities that were immeasurably greater than those of non-human primates. We see this in the rapid innovation in tool making, the development of complex language, and the creation of sophisticated art forms, none of which we find in our closest relatives. While we can readily observe the results of this high-order cognitive capacity, it is difficult to see how it could have developed. We take up the topic of cave art and archeoacoustics, particularly the discovery that cave art is often closely connected to the acoustic properties of the cave chambers in which it is found. Apparently, early modern humans were able to detect the way sound reverberated in these chambers, and they painted artwork on surfaces that were acoustic “hot spots,” i.e., suitable for generating echoes. We argue that cave art is a form of cross-modality information transfer, in which acoustic signals are transformed into symbolic visual representations. This form of information transfer across modalities is an instance of how the symbolic mind of early modern humans was taking shape into concrete, externalized language. We also suggest that the earliest rock art found in Africa may constitute one of the first fossilized proxies for the expression of full-fledged human linguistic behavior.

From Physical Aggression to Verbal Behavior: Language Evolution and Self-Domestication Feedback Loop

“…This enables us to metaphorize and metonymize, as well as to grammaticalize, and ultimately, to make languages change (see Benítez-Burraco, 2017 for discussion). They are thus also directly relevant for the consideration of cross-modality in the evolution of language, as discussed by, e.g., Cuskley and Kirby (2013) and Miyagawa et al (2018).…”

No Country for Oldowan Men: Emerging Factors in Language Evolution

“…In summary, we can say with some confidence that the apparently human-unique capacity for language-specific syntax emerged within the last 200 kya, and we can say this thanks to the development of sophisticated tools, cultural artifacts, complex trading relationships, and paintings. Indeed Miyagawa et al (2018) draw a connection between cave paintings and “archeoacoustics,” noting that cave art is typically connected to the acoustic properties of the chambers they are located in. Being sensitive to the echoes generated in these chambers, Miyagawa et al speculate that cave paintings may have been a form of cross-modality information transfer through which acoustic signals are transformed into visual representations.…”

Chomsky with Lewis: Human Nature, Science and Language Origin

“…His research program in the last sixty years, which has resulted in evolving different linguistic models, has tried to make this variety in the externalization of languages compatible and coherent with their underlying cognitive unity within the innate computational system framework of Generative Grammar. This externalization of language involves 4This thesis finds support in studies about the sudden externalization of the symbolic mode of thinking found in prehistorical cave and rock art going hand in hand with the appearance of language (seeMiyagawa et al 2018).…”