2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-mode bioelectrical impedance analysis in a standing position for estimating fat-free mass validated against dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of equations have been validated in adult populations. 27 29 Current research confirms the suitability of the above method in the assessment of nutritional status, in both hyperalimentation 30 , 31 and malnutrition. 32 34 The phase angle (PA), a valuable indicator of nutritional assessment based on BIA, is calculated by means of the formula PA = arctan (Xc/R) × (180/π), where arctan – arctangent, Xc – reactance, R-resistance, π – 3.14.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…A number of equations have been validated in adult populations. 27 29 Current research confirms the suitability of the above method in the assessment of nutritional status, in both hyperalimentation 30 , 31 and malnutrition. 32 34 The phase angle (PA), a valuable indicator of nutritional assessment based on BIA, is calculated by means of the formula PA = arctan (Xc/R) × (180/π), where arctan – arctangent, Xc – reactance, R-resistance, π – 3.14.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…At last, we relied on simplified BIA to measure body composition, which is not the gold standard. However, such methodology has been shown to have good reliability and accuracy when compared with standard methods (20,29,39,40), and the BIA scale used in this study was routinely calibrated throughout the study. In summary, we report novel associations of body composition measures including BF, SCF, VF, and RMR with presence and severity of DR. Concurrently, we also documented that RMR had the most significant contribution to DR in this study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we did not examine the validity and accuracy of BIA, Japanese investigators ( 40 , 41 ) reported the strong correlations between VFA by abdominal CT and VFA by BIA ( r = 0.88, p < 0.001), between VFA by X-ray CT and VFA by BIA ( r = 0.89, p < 0.001). BIA also has favorable effects on evaluation of skeletal muscle mass ( 42 ) and on assessing fat-free mass ( 43 ). We consider that VFA measurement by this technique can be enough as a screening to recognize the accumulation of visceral fat, which leads to MetS and increases risks of cerebro-cardiovascular diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%