2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-nanoflower CoS2 in-situ self-assembled on rGO sheet as advanced anode for lithium/sodium ion battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in Figures h and S6i,j, the capacitance contribution increases with the scan rate increases. From the quantified results, CoS 2 @NCNTs-650 has a higher capacitance contribution rate under various scan rates, which helps to improve the high current cycling performance and rate performance of the electrode material. , The difference in electrochemical performance between the electrode materials was further studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and the results are listed in Figure h and Table S2. The R f and R ct of CoS 2 @NCNTs-650 are 32.57 and 8.01 Ω, respectively, which are significantly lower than those of CoS 2 @NCNTs-550 (60.15 and 23.78 Ω, respectively) and CoS 2 @NCNTs-750 (52.92 and 19.36 Ω, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are shown in Figures h and S6i,j, the capacitance contribution increases with the scan rate increases. From the quantified results, CoS 2 @NCNTs-650 has a higher capacitance contribution rate under various scan rates, which helps to improve the high current cycling performance and rate performance of the electrode material. , The difference in electrochemical performance between the electrode materials was further studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and the results are listed in Figure h and Table S2. The R f and R ct of CoS 2 @NCNTs-650 are 32.57 and 8.01 Ω, respectively, which are significantly lower than those of CoS 2 @NCNTs-550 (60.15 and 23.78 Ω, respectively) and CoS 2 @NCNTs-750 (52.92 and 19.36 Ω, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxidation peak observed at 1.8–2.1 V corresponds to the formation of CoS 2 . Based on previous research, the electrochemical reaction process is shown below , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table S2: Electrochemical performance comparison of the as-prepared CoS 2 @rGO anode with other previously reported CoS 2 -based anodes in LIBs. References [41][42][43] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With continued economic and technological development, as an advanced electrochemical charge storage device, rechargeable batteries have been widely used in small electronic devices, such as smart phones, tablet computers, smart bracelets, drones, and electric vehicles, and are expected to be used in large-scale energy storage equipment in the near future. [1][2][3] Traditional inorganic electrode materials, for example, lithium titanate (Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 ), [4] metal oxide (M x O y ), [5] metal sulfide (M x S y ), [6,7] layered transition metal oxides (LTMOs) (Ni/Mn + the cathode) [8] and alloy-type anode materials (Si, Sn) [9,10] are subject to expensive raw materials and limited resources. To pursue higher purity and crystallinity and stable crystal structures, high temperature solid phase reactions are important as they results in higher greenhouse gas emissions and high process cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%