2004
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.94.2.517-522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-National Stability of a Leadership Model

Abstract: This study explored 60 Greek-Cypriot managers' perceptions of different dimensions of leadership. Analyses using structural equation modeling were performed to examine the invariance of the Flamholtz six-factor leadership model. The same leadership styles observed in samples from countries previously studied were present in the sample from Cyprus. In terms of the importance assigned to each style of leadership, Cypriot managers emphasized the more directive styles to a greater extent than other styles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of the terms etic and emic, Morrison (2000) used the terms generalizable and idiosyncratic. A variation in terminology is suggested by Marcoulides et al (2004) who referred to the rationalist and culturalist views, and indicated that leadership practices depend on sector developments, as well as on the uniqueness of a country's culture. Selvarajah et al 's framework is based on the assumption that there are leadership factors that are universal (etic), but that these factors are manifested in various overt behaviours which depend on the cultural (emic) context, thus sidestepping the etic‐emic dilemma (Javidan and Carl, 2004; De Jong et al , 2009; Smith et al , 1989).…”
Section: The Framework Of Excellent Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of the terms etic and emic, Morrison (2000) used the terms generalizable and idiosyncratic. A variation in terminology is suggested by Marcoulides et al (2004) who referred to the rationalist and culturalist views, and indicated that leadership practices depend on sector developments, as well as on the uniqueness of a country's culture. Selvarajah et al 's framework is based on the assumption that there are leadership factors that are universal (etic), but that these factors are manifested in various overt behaviours which depend on the cultural (emic) context, thus sidestepping the etic‐emic dilemma (Javidan and Carl, 2004; De Jong et al , 2009; Smith et al , 1989).…”
Section: The Framework Of Excellent Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%