1999
DOI: 10.1109/8.791940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross polarization on line-of-sight links in a tropical location: effects of the variation in canting angle and rain dropsize distributions

Abstract: The effects of the variation in canting angle of falling raindrops and the distribution of raindrop sizes in different types of rain on cross-polarization discrimination (XPD) on line-ofsight propagation paths in a tropical location in the frequency range 1-50 GHz are investigated. The dropsize distribution (DSD) model of [1] has been used. Although, some previous studies of XPD assumed equi-orientation of the raindrops along the propagation paths, the present study employs the more realistic distribution of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While channel degradation due to the XPD for low-latitude tropical paths longer than 2 km at low frequencies will be due to the phase shift, at high frequencies it will be due to signal attenuation. Nevertheless, it was shown elsewhere recently [Ajewole et al, 1998] that the XPD computed using a constant canting angle model, as was done in this study, may be poorer by as much as-7 dB than in the case when canting angle distribution is taken into consideration. The results of the constant canting angle model as presented in this study therefore may be quite exaggerated.…”
Section: Cross Polarization Due To Rainmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…While channel degradation due to the XPD for low-latitude tropical paths longer than 2 km at low frequencies will be due to the phase shift, at high frequencies it will be due to signal attenuation. Nevertheless, it was shown elsewhere recently [Ajewole et al, 1998] that the XPD computed using a constant canting angle model, as was done in this study, may be poorer by as much as-7 dB than in the case when canting angle distribution is taken into consideration. The results of the constant canting angle model as presented in this study therefore may be quite exaggerated.…”
Section: Cross Polarization Due To Rainmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Due to the nonspherical shape of the falling raindrops, and the tendency for raindrops to align in a particular direction at one time (canting angle) [14], GNSS polarimetric phase shift occurs. Polarimetric phase shift, namely the phase difference between the horizontally and vertically polarized components, can be expressed as ∆φ " φ h´φv (1) where ∆φ is in millimetres, φ h and φ v denote the horizontally and vertically polarized phases, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these effects are rain distortion and scattering in urban environments [ 8 ] that cause severe attenuation of the transmitted signals in addition to significant fading effects at the receiver. Moreover, these effects cause transformation of the polarization components of the propagating electromagnetic wave in the media [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], including the outcome of None-Line-of-Site (NLOS). Considering rain distortions or urban objects means taking into account that a relationship exists between the input and the output linear depolarizing electric field components, propagating from the raindrop or the scattering objects in the medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%