2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2021.129907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-reactivity of two human IL-6 family cytokines OSM and LIF explored by protein-protein docking and molecular dynamics simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarities in amino acid residues within the so called binding site III, comprising the AB loop, BC loop and D helix, as revealed by superposition of their crystal structures, may account for the common use of LIFR by OSM and LIF. This was further evidenced by protein–protein docking and molecular dynamics simulations [ 62 ]. Importantly, based on these docking experiments, the stability of the OSM:LIFR complex appears to be less stable than the LIF:LIFR complex.…”
Section: Bone Cell Expression and Binding Specificity Of Osm Osmr And...mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarities in amino acid residues within the so called binding site III, comprising the AB loop, BC loop and D helix, as revealed by superposition of their crystal structures, may account for the common use of LIFR by OSM and LIF. This was further evidenced by protein–protein docking and molecular dynamics simulations [ 62 ]. Importantly, based on these docking experiments, the stability of the OSM:LIFR complex appears to be less stable than the LIF:LIFR complex.…”
Section: Bone Cell Expression and Binding Specificity Of Osm Osmr And...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The common use of the type I complex by OSM and LIF may be explained by similarities of the two cytokines revealed by computational modeling of their interaction with LIFR [ 62 ] based on existing data from crystallography studies of LIF–LIFR interaction [ 63 ] and site-directed mutagenesis of OSM [ 64 , 65 ]. Although the percentage of matching amino acid residues between human OSM and human LIF is only between 22 and 29% [ 66 ], they have convergent 3D structures comprising 4α-helices, named A, B C and D, linked by polypeptide loops [ 51 , 67 ].…”
Section: Bone Cell Expression and Binding Specificity Of Osm Osmr And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, HawkDock [ 46 ] was performed to preliminarily explore the poses of each VNAR and TNFα, which generated the top 10 prediction complex models. Referring to the binding epitopes of Nanobodies on human TNFα [ 48 ], 5 reasonable models were then selected for RosettaDock using the same setup as recent studies [ 55 , 56 ]. In brief, the initial model was prepacked and used as a starting point for several rounds of local docking to generate 1000 decoys by running RosettaDock with the Monte Carlo (MC) refinement method [ 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, the initial model was prepacked and used as a starting point for several rounds of local docking to generate 1000 decoys by running RosettaDock with the Monte Carlo (MC) refinement method [ 57 ]. Finally, the docking funnel of the trajectory describing the characteristics of the interface score (I-sc) of each decoy and the interface root-mean-square deviation (I_rmsd) was made to find the reasonable model of each complex [ 55 , 56 , 58 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Amber 18 graphic processing unit (GPU) particle mesh Ewald molecular dynamic (PMEMD) was employed in the MD simulations. The force-field-related parameters and protein description were handled with FF14SB [ 37 , 38 ]. LEAP module implementation of Amber18 was utilised in the addition of hydrogen atoms to the neuraminidase (protein) and subsequent counter-ions additions to neutralise the system [ 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%