1993
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-56483-7_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross references are features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schwanke and Platoff's paper gives no motivation for why both feature kinds should be including, nor why they should be distinguished between [1]. We will in the following section try to provide motivation for doing so.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schwanke and Platoff's paper gives no motivation for why both feature kinds should be including, nor why they should be distinguished between [1]. We will in the following section try to provide motivation for doing so.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea originates from Schwanke and Platoff's paper "Cross references are features" [1]. Schwanke and Platoff also propose distinguishing between user-names (features representing other entities that use the entity) from names-used (features representing what the entity is using).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-engineering often deals primarily with module views [63] and aims to improve the static system structure. In our approach, we used mainly instancelevel runtime architectural views to visualize and reason about the subject system (Figures 11 and 15), although we did consider static module view ( Figure 6) to take into account ArchJava and AliasJava's rules concerning inheritance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reverse engineering field, there has been research on measuring similarity of components and restructuring modules in a software system, to improve its maintainability and understandability [36][37][38]. Such similarity measures are based on several metric values such as shared identifier names and function invocation relations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%