Cross section measurement of 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:math>
 at 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:

Ablikim, M.; Ачасов, М. Н.; Adlarson, P.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Amoroso, A.; An, Q.; Anita, Anita; Bai, X. H.; Bai, Y.; Bakina, O.; Ferroli, R. Baldini; Balossino, I.; Ban, Y.; Begzsuren, K.; Bennett, J. V.; Berger, N.; Bertani, M.; Bettoni, D.; Bianchi, F.; Biernat, J.; Bloms, J.; Bortone, A.; Boyko, I. R.; Briere, R. A.; Cai, H.; Cai, X.; Calcaterra, A.; Cao, G. F.; Cao, N.; Çetin, S. A.; Chang, J. F.; Chang, W. L.; Chelkov, G.; Chen, D. Y.; Chen, G.; Chen, H. S.; Chen, M. L.; Chen, S. J.; Chen, X. R.; Chen, Y. B.; Chen, Z. J.; Cheng, W. S.; Cibinetto, G.; Cossio, F.; Cui, X. F.; Dai, H. L.; Dai, J. P.; Dai, X. C.; Dbeyssi, A.; Boer, R. B. de; Dedovich, D.; Deng, Z. Y.; Denig, A.; Denysenko, I.; Destefanis, M.; Mori, F. De; Ding, Y.; Dong, C.; Dong, J.; Dong, L. Y.; Dong, M. Y.; Du, S. X.; Fang, J.; Fang, S. S.; Fang, Y.; Farinelli, R.; Fava, L.; Feldbauer, F.; Felici, G.; Feng, C. Q.; Fritsch, M.; Fu, C. D.; Fu, Y.; Gao, X. L.; Gao, Y.; Garzia, I.; Gersabeck, E.; Gilman, A.; Goetzen, K.; Gong, L.; Gong, W. X.; Gradl, W.; Greco, M.; Gu, L. M.; Gu, M. H.; Gu, S.; Gu, Y. T.; Guan, C. Y.; Guo, A. Q.; Guo, L. B.; Guo, R. P.; Guo, Y. P.; Guskov, A.; Han, S.; Han, Tao; Han, T. Z.; Hao, X. Q.; Harris, F. A.; He, K. L.; Heinsius, F. H.; Held, T.; Heng, Y. K.; Himmelreich, M.; Holtmann, T.; Hou, Y. R.; Hou, Z. L.; Hu, H. M.; Hu, J.; Hu, T.; Hu, Y.; Huang, G. S.; Huang, L. Q.; Huang, X. T.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Huesken, N.; Hussain, T.; Andersson, W. Ikegami; Imoehl, W.; Irshad, M.; Jaeger, S.; Janchiv, S.; Ji, Q.; Ji, X. B.; Ji, X. L.; Jiang, H. B.; Jiang, X. S.; Jiang, X. Y.; Jiao, J. B.; Jiao, Z.; Jin, S.; Jin, Y.; Johansson, T.; Kalantar‐Nayestanaki, N.; Kang, X. S.; Kappert, R.; Kavatsyuk, M.; Ke, B. C.; Keshk, I. K.; Khoukaz, A.; Kiese, P.; Kiuchi, R.; Kliemt, R.; Koch, L.; Kolcu, O. B.; Kopf, B.; Kuemmel, M.; Kuessner, M.; Kupść, A.; Kurth, M. G.; Kühn, W.; Lane, J. J.; Lange, J. S.; Larin, P.; Lavezzi, L.; Leithoff, H.; Lellmann, M.; Lenz, T.; Li, C.; Li, C. H.; Li, Cheng; Li, D. M.; Li, F.; Li, G.; Li, H. B.; Li, H. J.; Li, J. L.; Li, J. Q.; Li, Ké; Li, L. K.; Li, Lei; Li, P. L.; Li, P. R.; Li, S. Y.; Li, W. D.; Li, W. G.; Li, X. H.; Li, X. L.; Li, Z. B.; Li, Z. Y.; Liang, H.; Liang, Y. F.; Liang, Y. T.; Liao, L. Z.; Libby, J.; Lin, C. X.; Liu, B.; Liu, B. J.; Liu, C. X.; Liu, D.; Liu, D. Y.; Liu, F. H.; Liu, Fang; Liu, Feng; Liu, H. B.; Liu, H. M.; Liu, Huanhuan; Liu, Huihui; Liu, J. B.; Liu, J. Y.; Liu, K.; Liu, K. Y.; Liu, Ke; Liu, L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, S. B.; Liu, Shuai; Liu, T.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y. B.; Liu, Z. A.; Liu, Z. Q.; Long, Y. F.; Lou, X.; Lu, F. X.; Lü, H. J.; Lu, J. D.; Lü, J. G.; Lu, X. L.; Lu, Y. P.; Luo, C. L.; Luo, M. X.; Luo, P. W.; Luo, T.; Luo, X. L.; Lusso, S.; Lyu, X. R.; C., F.; L., H.; L., L.; M., M.; M., Q.; Q., R.; T., R.; N., X.; X., X.; Y., X.; M., Y.; Maas, F. E.; Maggiora, M.; Maldaner, S.; Malde, S.; Malik, Q. A.; Mangoni, A.; Mao, Y.; Mao, Z. P.; Marcello, S.; Meng, Z.; Messchendorp, J. G.; Mezzadri, G.; Min, T. J.; Mitchell, R. E.; Mo, X. H.; Mo, Y. J.; Muchnoi, N. Yu.; Muramatsu, H.; Nakhoul, S.; Nefedov, Y.; Nerling, F.; Nikolaev, I. B.; Ning, Z.; Nisar, S.; Olsen, S. L.; Ouyang, Q.; Pacetti, S.; Pan, X.; Pan, Y.; Pathak, A.; Patterí, P.; Pelizaeus, M.; Peng, H.; Peters, K.; Pettersson, J.; Ping, J. L.; Ping, R. G.; Pitka, A.; Poling, R.; Prasad, V.; Qi, H. R.; Qi, M.; Qi, T. Y.; Qian, S.; Qian, W.; Qian, Z.; Qiao, C. F.; Liu, Qin; Qin, X. S.; Qin, Z. H.; Qiu, J. F.; Qu, S. Q.; Rashid, K. H.; Ravindran, K.; Redmer, C. F.; Rivetti, A.; Rodin, V.; Rolo, M.; Rong, G.; Rosner, Ch.; Rump, M.; Sarantsev, A.; Schelhaas, Y.; Schnier, C.; Schoenning, K.; Shan, D. C.; Shan, W.; Shan, X. Y.; Shao, M.; Shen, C. P.; Shen, P. X.; Shen, X. Y.; Shi, H. C.; Shi, R. S.; Shi, X.; Song, Jianjun; Song, Q. Q.; Song, W. M.; Song, Y. X.; Sosio, S.; Spataro, S.; Sui, F. F.; Sun, G. X.; Sun, J. F.; Sun, L.; Sun, S. S.; Sun, T.; Sun, W. Y.; Sun, X. H.; Sun, Y. J.; Sun, Y. K.; Sun, Y. Z.; Sun, Z. T.; Tan, Y. H.; Tan, Y. X.; Tang, C. J.; Tang, G. Y.; Tang, J.; Thoren, V.; Tsednee, B.; Uman, I.; Wang, B.; Wang, B. L.; Wang, C. W.; Wang, D. Y.; Wang, H. P.; Wang, K.; Wang, L. L.; Wang, M.; Wang, M. Z.; Wang, Meng; Wang, W. H.; Wang, W. P.; Wang, X.; Wang, X. F.; Wang, X. L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. D.; Wang, Y. F.; Wang, Y. Q.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z. Y.; Wang, Ziyi; Wang, Zongyuan; Wei, D. H.; Weidenkaff, P.; Weidner, F.; Wen, S. P.; White, D. J.; Wiedner, U.; Wilkinson, G.; Wolke, M.; Wollenberg, L.; Wu, Jian; Wu, L. H.; Wu, L. J.; Wu, X.; Wu, Z.; Xia, L.; Xiao, H.; Xiao, S. Y.; Xiao, Y. J.; Xiao, Z. J.; Xie, X. H.; Xie, Y.; Xie, Y.; Xing, T. Y.; Xiong, X. A.; Xu, G. F.; Xu, J. J.; Xu, Q. J.; Xu, W.; Xu, X. P.; Yan, L.; Yan, W. B.; Yan, W. C.; Yan, Xu; Yang, H. J.; Yang, H. X.; Yang, L.; Yang, R. X.; Yang, S.; Yang, Yifan; Yang, Yifan; Yang, Zhi; Ye, M.; Ye, M. H.; Yin, J. H.; Zhou, You; Yu, B. X.; Yu, C. X.; Yu, G.; Yu, J. S.; Yu, T.; Yuan, C. Z.; Yuan, W. L.; Yuan, X. Q.; Yuan, Y.; Yuan, Z. Y.; Yue, C. X.; Yuncu, A.; Zafar, A. A.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, B. X.; Zhang, Guangyi; Zhang, H. H.; Zhang, H. Y.; Zhang, J. L.; Zhang, J. Q.; Zhang, J. W.; Zhang, J. Y.; Zhang, J. Z.; Zhang, Jianyu; Zhang, Jiawei; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Lei; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. F.; Zhang, T. J.; Zhang, X. Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. H.; Zhang, Y. T.; Zhang, Yan; Zhang, Yao; Zhang, Yi; Zhang, Z. H.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Zhao; Zhao, Ling; Zhao, M. G.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, S. J.; Zhao, Y. B.; Zhao, Y. X.; Zhao, Z.; Zhemchugov, A.; Zheng, B.; Zheng, J. P.; Zheng, Y.; Zhong, B.; Chen, Zhong; Li, Zhou; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, Xiang; Zhou, X. R.; Zhu, A. N.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, K. J.; Zhu, S. H.; Zhu, W. J.; Zhu, Xiaoyu; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, Z. A.; Zou, B. S.; Zou, J. H.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.092014

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Attempts have also been made to study channels with simpler topologies, including the processes e + e − → K + K − , where a resonance with a mass of (2239.2 ± 7.1 ± 11.3) MeV/c 2 and a width of (139.8 ± 12.3 ± 20.6) MeV is seen [33]; e + e − → φK + K − [34], where a sharp enhancement is observed in the Born cross section lineshape at a center-of-mass (c.m.) energy of √ s = 2.2324 GeV; e + e − → φη ′ [35], where a resonance with a mass of (2177.5 ± 5.1 ± 18.6) MeV/c 2 and a width of (149.0 ± 15.6 ± 8.9) MeV is seen; e + e − → ωη [38], a resonance with a mass of (2179 ± 21 ± 3) MeV/c 2 and a width of (89 ± 28 ± 5) MeV is observed with a significance of 6.1σ; e + e − → φη [36], a resonant structure is observed with parameters determined to be M = (2163.5 ± 6.2 ± 3.0) MeV/c 2 and Γ = (31.1 +21.1 −11.6 ± 1.1) MeV; and e + e − → K 0 S K 0 L [37], a resonant structure around 2.2 GeV is observed, with a mass and width of 2273.7 ± 5.7 ± 19.3 MeV/c 2 and 86 ± 44 ± 51 MeV respectively. The Breit-Wigner parameters of φ(2170) are not consistent between the different studies, especially concerning the width.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to ϕπ^+ π^-$ cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV

Collaboration¹,

Ablikim²,

Achasov³

et al. 2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to ϕπ^+ π^-$ cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV

Collaboration¹,

Ablikim²,

Achasov³

et al. 2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…6 For e + e − → K + K − , the experimental JHEP07(2023)037 datasets are from SND [39,97,98], BaBar [80], CMD-2 [99], CMD-3 [100], and BESIII [101]. For e + e − → K 0 L K 0 S , the experiment datasets are from SND [35,39], BaBar [41], CMD-2 [102], CMD-3 [40], BESIII [42], OLYA [36] and DM1 [37]. Notice that some of the experimental datasets are given in terms of the dressed cross sections, and some others are of the bare ones.…”

Section: Jhep07(2023)037mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the past decade, the measurements by SND in 2016 [40] and BABAR [41] in 2014 supply high statistics cross sections in the φ resonance region and make a precise analysis possible. There is also a recent measurement in the high-energy region of [2.00-3.08] GeV by BESIII [42]. For the last two processes of e + e − → π 0 γ and ηγ, they have not been studied in our approach before, and we take them into the analysis for completeness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Two body final states production in electron-positron annihilation and their contributions to (g − 2)μ

Wang

Fang

Dai

2023

J. High Energ. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we study the processes of e+e− annihilation into two body final states, either two pseudoscalar mesons or one meson with a photon. The hadronic vacuum polarization form factors are calculated within the framework of resonance chiral theory in the energy region of E ≲ 2 GeV, with final state interactions taken into account. A joint analysis on the processes of e+e−→ π+π−, K+K−, $$ {K}_L^0{K}_S^0 $$ K L 0 K S 0 , π0γ, and ηγ has been performed, and the latest experimental data are included. Based on the vacuum polarization form factors of these processes, we estimate their contributions to the lowest order of anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, (g – 2)μ. Combined with other contributions from hadronic vacuum polarization and other interactions from the standard model, the discrepancy between theoretical prediction and experimental measurement is ∆aμ = (24.1 ± 5.4) × 10−10, i.e., 4.5σ.

show abstract

“…corresponding to about ±3σ around the known π 0 mass [39]. The selected candidate events are used to perform the PWA, while the events in the sideband region [30,60] MeV/c 2 are used to estimate the background contribution. No peaking background is observed in the π 0 signal region.…”

Section: Event Selection and Background Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With the data samples collected with the BESIII detector at nineteen center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 647 pb −1 , the Born cross sections of exclusive hadron channels have been measured and excited meson states have been searched for with the processes e + e − → η′(958 30], ϕη [31], ϕη′(958) [32], and ϕK + K − [33]. In this paper, the Born cross sections of the process e + e − → π + π − π 0 and its intermediate processes (through ρπ and ρ(1450)π) are measured with the same data samples.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of e+e− → D+D−π+π− at center-of-mass energies from 4.36 to 4.60 GeV

Ablikim¹,

Ачасов²,

Adlarson³

et al. 2020

Physics Letters B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross section measurement of e+e−→KS0KL0 at

Cited by 15 publications

References 59 publications

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to ϕπ^+ π^-$ cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to ϕπ^+ π^-$ cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV

Two body final states production in electron-positron annihilation and their contributions to (g − 2)μ

Study of e+e− → D+D−π+π− at center-of-mass energies from 4.36 to 4.60 GeV

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Cross section measurement of e+e−→KS0KL0 at

Cited by 15 publications

References 59 publications

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to ϕπ^+ π^-$ cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV

Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to ϕπ^+ π^-$ cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV

Two body final states production in electron-positron annihilation and their contributions to (g − 2)μ

Study of e+e− → D+D−π+π− at center-of-mass energies from 4.36 to 4.60 GeV

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Study of e+e− → D+D−π+π− at center-of-mass energies from 4.36 to 4.60 GeV