2021
DOI: 10.1134/s1063778821100392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Section of Tritium Production in Structural Materials of Accelerator-Driven Facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reactions under scrutiny are those involving the most important progenitors of Li, Be, and B isotopes and ghosts (see below), that is (i) B, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, and Si, as highlighted in Génolini et al (2018); (ii) specific production of some light isotopes from Li and Be progenitors (for completeness of the Z ≤ 6 progenitors), and (iii) Fe which is the main novelty of this study. Indeed, new relevant fragmentation data from 56 Fe (Napolitani et al 2004;Herbach et al 2006;Villagrasa-Canton et al 2007;Titarenko et al 2008Titarenko et al , 2011 were published seemingly after the galprop database was last updated. Finally, our cross-checks lead us to replace some of the Read & Viola (1984) compiled data (used in the galprop file) by the original ones, and a few were even removed (because they corresponded to cumulative cross sections, i.e.…”
Section: Nuclear Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactions under scrutiny are those involving the most important progenitors of Li, Be, and B isotopes and ghosts (see below), that is (i) B, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, and Si, as highlighted in Génolini et al (2018); (ii) specific production of some light isotopes from Li and Be progenitors (for completeness of the Z ≤ 6 progenitors), and (iii) Fe which is the main novelty of this study. Indeed, new relevant fragmentation data from 56 Fe (Napolitani et al 2004;Herbach et al 2006;Villagrasa-Canton et al 2007;Titarenko et al 2008Titarenko et al , 2011 were published seemingly after the galprop database was last updated. Finally, our cross-checks lead us to replace some of the Read & Viola (1984) compiled data (used in the galprop file) by the original ones, and a few were even removed (because they corresponded to cumulative cross sections, i.e.…”
Section: Nuclear Datamentioning
confidence: 99%