1981
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Sectional Clinical Evaluation of Recurrent Enamel Caries, Restoration of Marginal Integrity, and Oral Hygiene Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies would be needed including also gaps in the range of a few microns. Because possible threshold values most probably also depend on other factors such as saliva, type of biofilm, frequency of nutrients, extent of oral hygiene measures, the type of restorative material, etc., no direct extrapolation into the clinical situation is possible [10,14,15,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies would be needed including also gaps in the range of a few microns. Because possible threshold values most probably also depend on other factors such as saliva, type of biofilm, frequency of nutrients, extent of oral hygiene measures, the type of restorative material, etc., no direct extrapolation into the clinical situation is possible [10,14,15,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of outcomes in this review was done depending on the fact that failures in adhesive restorations occurs mainly due to secondary caries, then poor marginal adaptation (17,22,23).…”
Section: Discussion:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Etiologic factors include a multitude of causes that broadly encompass poor marginal adaptation of existing restorations or previously existing caries that was inadequately removed. Recurrent caries account for approximately 42-88% of the need for restorative dentistry [Goldberg et al, 1981;Bergman et al, 1982;Hansen, 1977]. Approximately 16% of restored teeth are known to develop recurrent caries [Goldberg et al, 1981].…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent caries account for approximately 42-88% of the need for restorative dentistry [Goldberg et al, 1981;Bergman et al, 1982;Hansen, 1977]. Approximately 16% of restored teeth are known to develop recurrent caries [Goldberg et al, 1981]. Recurrent caries has been reported to be the main reason for replacement of amalgam restorations [Espelid and Tveit, 1991].…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%