2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2004.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross sections for charge change in argon and equilibrium charge states of 3.5MeV/amu uranium ions passing through argon and carbon targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Figure shows that for a given collision energy the probability of the 12-fold and more ionization processes is too small. This result is in correspondence with the experimental data [10] available only for number of ejected electrons m ≤ 11.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Figure shows that for a given collision energy the probability of the 12-fold and more ionization processes is too small. This result is in correspondence with the experimental data [10] available only for number of ejected electrons m ≤ 11.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The corresponding experimental data are taken from the Refs. [9,10], and are in a reasonable agreement with results of our calculations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2(b) [34]. The Q eq data of U in heavier gases with Z ≥ 7 are indicated by open diamonds [16,18,19,22,[35][36][37] along with the plot of the semi-empirical formula (long-dashed line) [36]. The Q eq of U in He is greater by almost 10 (Q eq =Z ∼ 0.1) when compared with those of other gases such as N 2 , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of data can be found in literature related to studies on charge fractions after collisions of atomic projectiles with solid targets. Early work on this problem was concentrated on the analysis of charge state distributions after the transmission of fast ions through thin solid foils or through targets with atoms in the gas phase over a wide domain of projectile velocities (Garnir et al, 1996;Grande & Schiwietz, 1998;Perumal, 2005), whereas such data for scattering experiments from surfaces of solid targets are rather rare Ramana et al, 2003;Yang and Jory, 2003;Nakajima et al, 2004). In recent years, however, the impact of atomic projectiles on the surface of solid targets has been paid increased attention, and measurements of charge fractions for energetic projectiles provided the basis for a microscopic understanding of the atom-surface interaction scenario (Kimura et al, 1992;Winter et al, 1998, Wethekam et al, 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%