Cross-Sector Collaboration for a Healthy Living Environment—Which Strategies to Implement, Why, and in Which Context?

Abstract

Background: Working toward a healthy living environment requires organizations from different policy domains and nongovernment partners involved in public health and the living environment to collaborate across sectors. The aim of this study is to understand how this cross-sector collaboration for a healthy living environment can be achieved. Methods: The realist evaluation approach was used to investigate what strategies can be used in which contexts to achieve cross-sector collaboration. The “Collaborative Adaptive Health Networks” framework was used as a theoretical framework. Seventeen partners of three Dutch projects collaborating for a healthy living environment in different regions were interviewed about their experiences during the initiating phase of their projects. Results: Seven themes for achieving cross-sector collaboration were identified, namely creating a feeling of equivalence, building trust, bridging different perspectives, providing clarity regarding roles and tasks, creating commitment, creating active engagement, and understanding whom to engage and when. For each theme, the strategies that were used, and why, were specified. Conclusion: This study provides new insights in how cross-sector collaboration for a healthy living environment can be achieved in different contexts. Whether the start of a cross-sectoral collaboration is successful is largely influenced by the choice of leadership and the interorganizational relations.

Working with parents of children with complex mental health issues to improve care: A qualitative inquiry

“…For example, leadership in the respective organizations can promote a shared culture of care, long-term trusting relationships and key players as ‘bridge builders’ to build knowledge, attitudes and skills for sharing a common vision and language with all partners ( Martsolf et al., 2018 ). Thus, a multi-faceted approach is required to streamline procedural differences and increase interaction, understanding and respect between sectors ( Mikkelsen et al, 2013 ; van Vooren et al, 2020 ). Resolutions to procedural differences include shared personnel or resources, written agreements and holding regularly scheduled meetings made possible by policies, programmes and fundings that enable cross-sector partnerships ( Ladekjær Larsen et al, 2020 ).…”

Examining Intersectoral Action as an Approach to Implementing Multistakeholder Collaborations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals

“…A key recommendation was that the role of the health sector should be flexible, only leading intersectoral work if it matches the framing of the identified issue or problem. Subsequent case studies and scoping reviews have identified common success factors, such as building trust among partners, creating connections between different sectors through networks, providing clarity and accountability for roles and responsibilities, information-sharing, engaging the public, and understanding the local political context [ 22 , 23 , 29 , 34 – 37 ]. The UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) released the SDG Partnership Guidebook, which describes successful partnerships for achieving the SDGs [ 10 ].…”

Coping Strategies Used by Older Adults to Deal with Contact Isolation in the Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…The transcripts were imported in the qualitative data analysis software program Atlas-Ti for data analysis [ 51 , 52 , 53 ]. Based on the initial program theories, a code tree was drafted by JB on possible coping strategies.…”