2018
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐Sector Collaboration in the High‐Poverty Setting: Qualitative Results from a Community‐Based Diabetes Intervention

Abstract: We identified several factors that motivated collaboration across diverse sectors with health care systems to promote health in a high-poverty, urban setting. Understanding these motivations will be foundational to optimizing meaningful cross-sector collaboration and improving diabetes outcomes in the nation's most vulnerable communities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding network structures, they explore how leadership impacts the formation of networks [ 8 44 47 58 61 68 69 71 82 90 100 101 ], the number and strength of network ties [ 51 56 63 64 67 77 78 ], network density [ 51 52 ], network centrality [ 9 51 ], network trust [ 70 72 75 ], network consensus [ 78 ] and network identity [ 84 ]. Regarding activity coordination, they examine how leadership affects patient and client referrals [ 7 10 48 50 52 53 59 60 62 65 66 79 89 91 98 102 ], care planning [ 7 45 48 54 55 57 80 93 95 96 97 102 104 ], information sharing [ 48 49 52 57 65 103 ], resource exchanges [ 7 52 99 102 ] and the alignment of care practices via protocols, pathways and evidence-based decision-making [ 13 46 73 87 88 92 <...>…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding network structures, they explore how leadership impacts the formation of networks [ 8 44 47 58 61 68 69 71 82 90 100 101 ], the number and strength of network ties [ 51 56 63 64 67 77 78 ], network density [ 51 52 ], network centrality [ 9 51 ], network trust [ 70 72 75 ], network consensus [ 78 ] and network identity [ 84 ]. Regarding activity coordination, they examine how leadership affects patient and client referrals [ 7 10 48 50 52 53 59 60 62 65 66 79 89 91 98 102 ], care planning [ 7 45 48 54 55 57 80 93 95 96 97 102 104 ], information sharing [ 48 49 52 57 65 103 ], resource exchanges [ 7 52 99 102 ] and the alignment of care practices via protocols, pathways and evidence-based decision-making [ 13 46 73 87 88 92 <...>…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Professional traditions/work practices [46,48,50,53,99, 100] • Organisational priorities and resources [43,45] • Multilateral boundary spanning [101] • Hospital ownership [102] • Leaders' motivation [8,44,103,104] • Leaders' tenure [66] network [75]. Moreover, performance is improved by network members working through cliques, which unite complementary services and establish trust among clique members [74].…”
Section: Leadership Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Research in Chicago turned the problem around: from asking how community organisations could be more involved in system approaches to population health, to concluding that health systems should be asking how they can be more involved in communitybased approaches already underway. 47 The depth of practice across the sites suggest that whole system working to build healthy communities is feasible and possible for wider adoption within other public health systems. Most interviewees were able to report outcomes and there was a range of approaches used or planned by all to evaluate impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 Research in Chicago turned the problem around: from asking how community organisations could be more involved in system approaches to population health, to concluding that health systems should be asking how they can be more involved in community-based approaches already underway. 47 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%